As it turns out it doesn’t actually cost that much on regular transit, there’s an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it’s an “airport train”.

No wonder Americans don’t use public transit, even when the system exists it’s ridiculously difficult and expensive to use.

Source

  • Shifty Eyes@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Imagine working minimum wage in SF and commuting in by BART + BUS / MUNI Lightrail / CALTRAIN / FERRY. Gotta work at least 2 hours just to cover the costs of your commute every day.

      • Entheon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Nope, very rarely do you see them cover it at all. That’s why we hate our 1+ hour drive commutes.

        • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Wtf? It’s normal in the Netherlands…

          Public transport will be the whole second class price. By car it is up to 23 cents per kilometer.

          • Entheon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Gosh that would be nice. Unfortunately we are stuck on simpler issues like “do kids deserve to eat at school”, so it’ll probably be a while before we get paid commute time.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        34 minutes ago

        Many do: I believe there is a tax incentive for them. I’ve only had it while working downtown, and in a white collar job. So not where you’d usually drive to work and not for hourly pay.

        Given that there are very few required benefits, it can be fairly regressive. You don’t get help with transit unless you’re an aid enough. You don’t get better health coverage unless you’re paid enough.

      • Shifty Eyes@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Not required. SF does have an ordinance to cover some costs depending on the number of employees. But its not some nationwide law.

        If you’re a fancy tech bro in SF all your costs are covered, health/dental/vision/life insurance, commuting stipend or govt subsidized account you get to put pre-tax money in and the company might match, matching contributions for your retirement 401K. The techbro class doesn’t care about the cost of BART, many of them take an UBER for 3-4x the BART faire and not bat and eye at the bill (or use the company UBER account for free). If you’re just some random minimum wage worker, you’d be lucky to live within an hour or two commute of SF and afford housing.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    i wondered, who is this person who is so out of touch that she thinks that is a reasonable price, and… she is a former member of congress from orange county who is currently campaigning to be governor of california 🤡

  • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    In case anyone is wondering, a one way trip from Oakland International Airport to the Civic Center station in San Francisco (the stop next to City Hall and the city’s largest open air fent market) is exactly $12.65.

    The trip from Oakland to Civic Center is “just” $5.20, but like OP said, there’s a fuckass stupid airport surcharge for the last half mile or so.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      Isn’t the idea of such a surcharge to encourage an alternate transit mode?

      Apparently they believe they don’t have enough taxis clogging the entrance? Every driver trying to reach my local airport should thank me for taking the airport shuttle.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Not only must everything profit, it must profit MORE than it did previously. If you make $10 million selling widgets last year, and make $10 million again this year, well that’s a failing business and you should be fired.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        If you predict that your business will be up 5% this quarter, and it’s only up 3%, that’s considered a disaster, and the stock price will drop, and that CEO is still in trouble. Repeat every quarter.

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because that’s the foundation and definition of capitalism. The market will provide (as long as there’s profit to be made).

      Not saying it’s right though.

      • Robbity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s not the definition or foundation of capitalism, it’s the definition of a market economy.

        The foundation of capitalism is a system where investors can pool small amounts of money together on big projects, to share risk and reward. Historically to fund trading ships on their way to the indies.

        So it destructures ownership, which has a million ripple effects on the organization and economy.

        • d00ery@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their use for the purpose of obtaining profit. This socioeconomic system has developed historically through several stages and is defined by a number of basic constituent elements: private property, profit motive, capital accumulation, competitive markets, commodification, wage labor, and an emphasis on innovation and economic growth.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

          In the context of “Why do Americans think everything has to profit?”, then the point is that the train is considered only for the profit it can make, and not for the environmental etc benefits. This is a result of the market economy as you rightly state (and private ownership of transportation).

  • emmanuel_car@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Meanwhile here in Germany I can use any bus, tram, U-Bahn, or train (excluding high speed) anywhere in the country for 58€/month

    • RamenDame@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The DeutschlandTicket is the best thing! I love it. I want that with their Steuernummer, baby’s get a DeutschlandTicket. Everybody needs a DeutschlandTicket.

      • Cobrachicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve been wondering why this hasn’t become a thing yet. Probably lobbying from all the Verkehrsverbünde.

        • NessD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No, they really want to keep it as cheap as possible. It’s the Bundesregierung that rather subsidises Diesel privileges and Pendlerpauschalen.

    • fristislurper@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But if you don’t have the D-ticket, good luck figuring out how the local ticketing machine works haha

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I want that in the Netherlands as well. Much smaller country, so less value for your money. But now you pay even more (€66) for a return ticket from the east border to the west border (Winterswijk - Scheveningen).

  • elgordino@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I once went through a BART gate line by mistake, I was trying to get to the trolley service and misread the signage. I immediately exited. The charge: $6.20. Still can’t believe it.

  • bitofarambler@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just got to Panama City, buses are a flat $0.25 regardless of distance and the Metro is a flat $0.50 regardless of distance.

    took the train for ~8 mi into town to get to my hotel for $0.50.

    • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m in Mumbai. The 37km north-south journey from one end of the city to the other costs 20¢ on the local train. $1.20 if you want to ride the fancy train with AC. East-west is 13km and costs 50¢ on the elevated metro line.

      • classic@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Just think: the public transport system in the bay area is one of the better ones in the u.s.

        • huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The poorer the country (not on average) the more demand there is for low-cost transit, that demand brings down the price of public transport tremendously because less public money is spend on other (more private) forms of transit. The ‘problem’ isn’t only people loving cars it’s also people being able to afford them. In general it also isn’t the rich asking for public healthcare and education. The lack of public transport shows the power of the wealthy over the power of the masses.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Metro is $0.19 for me, so are trolleybuses. Our exchange rate is fucked, but hey, at least it makes it sound impressively cheap

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I had to go through SF a few times this year. I have no idea how much the transit cost, but it was fucking expensive and I just rode a few times per day across town or to the airport.

    I love public transit systems and being free to move around a city using them. It’s a truly liberating experience to have real freedom, but damn SF was tough to understand and weird in places. They’ve got to unify the system and start paying for it or it’s going to just keep crushing their downtown areas when no one uses the transit to visit.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    for bart, it charges by the distance, for muni, they recently up thier fees for tickets, they are also have a budget mismangment issue which causes thier budget problems. they waste twice as much as they bring in through fare evasion fees, and transit fees, last i heard they are cutting some services in the summer. and there has some justification for fare evasion(just dont discuss this on reddit, because its mostly been infiltrated by do-gooders conservatives)

    caltrain is a seperate agency than, bart, muni.

    • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Pretty sure must of us aren’t going anywhere near Reddit. Muni seems a mess from my perspective, but when I visit there from sac the $8 or whatever it is for all day transit seems reasonable to me. Might have the price wrong, last time I was there was Chinese New Year and I rode the cable cars all day which was totally worth the $8. But I might as well be a tourist so I don’t know just how fucked it all is.