• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Latino” is a white supremacist term. It’s a denial of ancestry from america, africa, etc. in favor of “latin” culture aka european. White supremacy needs new blood to survive in USA. That’s the whole point of “latino”. That’s why “latinos” are encouraged to think they’re “white”. Meanwhile “whiteness” is nothing more than an oppressive system of racist control.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a European I don’t get it anyway. Spanish people are white, but apparently are “people of colour” in the US.

      I’m guessing it’s one of those “where you came from” things that Americans obsess over. Americans were even “racist” to the Italians and they’re pretty much the whitest country in Europe these days.

      • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Up until the mid 20th century, a lot of Americans didn’t consider Catholic’s to be “white.”

        It was a really big deal when Irish Catholic John F Kennedy was elected president.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Whiteness is not an objective quality of people but a socially constructed category that expands or contracts depending on what is needed to maintain in group dominance.

        When the in group is weak, you’ll see more people being considered “white,” and when it is strong, the tests will get stricter (looking not only at skin color, for example, but at ancestry). It’s really just a question of how confident racists are that they have sufficient clout to exclude a particular group without undermining their exclusion of other groups.