Putting aside the fact that I doubt the size of the mummified bird is regulation, the way the cat is hanging onto the ring elbows straight and for such an extended time, I would say it is debatable whether this slam dunk is legal or not. This arguably could be classified as taunting resulting in a potential technical foul.
The rules were updated in the 90s to allow wise cracking bunnies, ducks and cats with lisps, tweety birds, pigs wearing no pants, and coyotes with an online purchasing addiction from ACME.
Is this even legal?
Putting aside the fact that I doubt the size of the mummified bird is regulation, the way the cat is hanging onto the ring elbows straight and for such an extended time, I would say it is debatable whether this slam dunk is legal or not. This arguably could be classified as taunting resulting in a potential technical foul.
Have they updated the rules of basketball yet to state which species can play it? I remember that being an issue in the '90s.
The rules were updated in the 90s to allow wise cracking bunnies, ducks and cats with lisps, tweety birds, pigs wearing no pants, and coyotes with an online purchasing addiction from ACME.
Probably? Animal carcasses are sold for food constantly. Why not art?
Frankly? No idea. I know taxidermy can be a touchy subject, but I do not know how it is treated. And mind you, this is eBay around early 2000’s