Well I am shocked, SHOCKED I say! Well, not that shocked.

  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t worry, you haven’t missed anything. Sure, the games are prettier, but most of them are designed and written more poorly than 99% of indie titles…

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The majority sure, but there are some gems though.

      Baldurs Gate 3, Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, Doom Eternal, Elden Ring, God Of War, … for example

      You can always wait for a couple of years before playing them, but saying they didn’t miss anything is a gross understatement.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      It’s funny, because often they aren’t prettier. Well optimized and well made games from 5 or even 10 years ago often look on par better than the majority of AAA slop pushed out now (obviously with exceptions of some really good looking games like space marine and some others) and the disk size is still 10x what it was. They are just unrefined and unoptimized and try to use computationally expensive filters, lighting, sharpening, and antialiasing to make up for the mediocre quality.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The irony is it is optimized in several notable cases, like cyberpunk 2077 and most major ue5 engine based games. It’s just all the mipmap levels from distant to 4k up close really add up when the game actually has a decent amount of content.

        I wonder how many people really run games at settings that require the highest detail. I bet a lot of people would appreciate half the DL size or more just to leave 'em out and disable ‘ultra’ settings.