SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoI'm gonna mute this onelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square242linkfedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down185
arrow-up11.01Karrow-down1imageI'm gonna mute this onelemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square242linkfedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agoSo hostile architecture is unnecessary.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoYeah. the problem of posh people being confronted with the icky poors.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 hour agoYes, posh people are the ones using benches. And riding on the fancy seats on the bus. That’s who it affects. Well reasoned.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·56 minutes agoThey don’t use the benches, but lord do they complain if they encounter a homeless person.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 minutes agoSo the “hostile architecture” doesn’t really benefit them, does it?
So hostile architecture is unnecessary.
It solves a different problem.
Yeah. the problem of posh people being confronted with the icky poors.
Yes, posh people are the ones using benches. And riding on the fancy seats on the bus. That’s who it affects. Well reasoned.
They don’t use the benches, but lord do they complain if they encounter a homeless person.
So the “hostile architecture” doesn’t really benefit them, does it?