Many teams are currently in their window (Bucks, Celtics, Suns, Sixers, Nuggets, etc). Who are the teams that are still 2-3 years away, but will be championship juggernauts for years to come?

  • Neemzeh@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I couldn’t imagine looking at OKC’s core, then the wolves core, and thinking the wolves core of Ant, Jaden, KAT and Naz isn’t capable of winning championships but OKC who hasn’t even made it past the play in are? Care to elaborate on that logic?

    • GeoffSproke@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least a portion of it comes from the idea that the Thunder’s additional picks and longer timeline (because they’re so much younger) will give them additional optionality… Whether they have to draft replacements for some of their guys that get too expensive, or push those picks in for a disgruntled star, they can do that. The wolves have fewer options in that regard, and Gobert has a bunch of miles on his legs and is on the wrong side of 30.

      • Neemzeh@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The front office of Tim Connelly who built the championship Denver nuggets? lol

    • House_of_Woodcock@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is the draft picks. The wolves team is more or less what it’ll be moving forward. (Maybe a little unfair, they have a couple trades they could make). The thunder may not even have their best player yet. They could trade a dragons hoard of picks for a superstar in the next couple years. So right now? Yeah I’d take they wolves in a 7 game series but the thunder have the potential to boat race the league in the next few years.

      • Neemzeh@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t work like that. Only so much salary to go around. Wolves traded all those picks but unless the new owners are willing to shell out a ton in luxury tax they’ll have to go. The new CBA prevents what you’re saying.

        OKC can do the same thing but let’s not pretend whoever they get with those picks and their current core can stay together. Chet and SGA will demand super maxes

        • Meloxian711@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It restricts things like signing mle for teams who are over the luxury tax, but it doesn’t restrict drafting, which is where the thunders picks come in. Teams over the tax can also make trades as long as they take less salary in then what they send out. So the thunders could still do a sign and trade for example.

      • Slim-Ticket@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But the difference is also 2 more years of playoff experience/development and experienced vets to guide them.

        Draft picks don’t equate to championships. Yes it gives flexibility but to win you usually need playoff seasoned stars and years of chemistry built in the playoffs. Ant at 22 has been to the playoffs twice as the #1 option, by the time he is in his prime (26) he could have 6 years of playoff experience.