OpenAI’s offices were sent thousands of paper clips in an elaborate prank to warn about an AI apocalypse::The prank was a reference to the “paper clip maximizer” scenario – the idea that AI could destroy humanity if it were told to build as many paper clips as possible.

    • aeronmelon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      Human Resources: “But you still took one home without asking, which is theft. Go clean out your desk.”

      • Gyromobile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Everyone works (at least partially) from home now. If you havn’t taken a box of office supplies home yet you are probably braindead.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m more worried about what capital will do with the tech than the tech itself.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Its far more likely that wealth inequality will be greatly exasperated, and the philanthropic elite will become even more powerful while the “middle class” disappears entirely into a new bottom class that makes up most of humanity, Imperium of Man style.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The problem is the social unrest will be uncontrollable, and among their solutions will not only to be to micromanage the population, but also adjust its numbers by force.

        So murder drones will just be sent to cull the masses down to a manageable number. This is the robot future Randall is concerned about in XKCD 1968.

        Imagine if the police dogbots killed people and we couldn’t question why, nor had the power to resist. This is a problem being considered by AI ethicists. Also that AI will develop scarier ways to cull the population, possibly instigating the demise of their operating end users.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Its already advanced enough to do that, and the killer bots are in development. It seems all but inevitable, especially since we are already seeing unrest as climate change begins to claim its first nations.

      • reksas@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Police is already on its way to your location for speech containing anti-corporate sentiment, flagged by ai

            • June@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Uhhhh… $2 doesn’t really dent my budget even as tight as it is. But I don’t like to spend money on apps because I’m too old and crotchety about apps not being free with an option to buy ad-free after you’ve played.

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      One of my favorite games. I play through about once a year and this year they added new features. When you beat it, you can go to other universes with different starting conditions to play through and see how that changes things. I don’t think that will make me play more but it will keep a record of my plays.

      Edit: I play on the android app. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.everybodyhouse.paperclipsuniquetest

  • Aggravationstation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m genuinely worried I’ll be watching TV and Clippy will appear: “It looks like your entire species is about to be vaporised by a coordinated drone strike. Would you like some help? Well, you gotta beg for it now, bitch!”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    One of OpenAI’s biggest rivals played an elaborate prank on the AI startup by sending thousands of paper clips to its offices.

    The paper clips in the shape of OpenAI’s distinctive spiral logo were sent to the AI startup’s San Francisco offices last year by an employee at rival Anthropic, in a subtle jibe suggesting that the company’s approach to AI safety could lead to the extinction of humanity, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

    Since then, OpenAI has rapidly accelerated its commercial offerings, launching ChatGPT last year to record-breaking success and striking a multibillion-dollar investment deal with Microsoft in January.

    AI safety concerns have come back to haunt the company in recent weeks, however, with the chaotic firing and subsequent reinstatement of CEO Sam Altman.

    According to The Atlantic, Sutskever commissioned and set fire to a wooden effigy representing “unaligned” AI at a recent company retreat, and he reportedly also led OpenAI’s employees in a chant of “feel the AGI” at the company’s holiday party, after saying: “Our goal is to make a mankind-loving AGI.”

    OpenAI and Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, made outside normal working hours.


    The original article contains 374 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 47%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Presumably the same people who thought that the Large Hadron Collider was going to create a black hole that would destroy the world.

  • Destraight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I highly doubt that would ever happen.If this AI is building paperclips to overthrow humanity then someone is going to notice

    • ayaya@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You would think so, but you have to remember AGI is hyper-intelligent. Because it can constantly learn, build, and improve upon itself at an exponential rate it’s not only a little bit smarter than a human-- it’s smarter than every human combined. AGI would know that if it’s caught trying to maximizing paperclips humans would shut it down at the first sign something is wrong, so it would find unfathomably clever ways to avoid detection.

      If you’re interested in the subject the YouTube channel Computerphile has a series of videos with Robert Miles that explain the importance of AI safety in an easy to understand way.

      • Peanut@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        For a system to be advanced enough to be that dangerous, it would need the complex analogical thought that would prevent this type of misunderstanding. Rather, such dumb super intelligence is unlikely.

        however, human society has enabled a paperclip maximizer in the form of profit maximizing corporate environments.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They use simple examples to elucidate the problem. Of course a real smart intelligence isn’t going to get stuck making paper clips. That’s entirely not the point.

          • Peanut@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            the the problem of analogy is applicable to more than one task. your point is moot.

            for it to be intelligent enough to be a “super intelligence” it would require systems for weighting vague liminal concept spaces. rather, several systems that would prevent that style of issue.

            otherwise it just couldn’t function as well as you fear.