• DryDefenderRS@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    2009, 2012, and 2014 kind of established that defenders cant get it anymore.

    At least its looking like true QB only now, rather than RB being the only non-QB exception.

    • srgntalpowell@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason it’s a discussion this year is the lack of elite QB play. It’s not comparable to those seasons

      • Flashy-Mcfoxtrot@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There has been 3 instances in over 60 years where it hasn’t been a QB or RB that won the award, and one of those is a kicker in a strike season. Nfl has almost effectively phased out the workhorse RB with all their rule changes towards the passing game for the past 25 years, so it is effectively only QB that can win it now. You can probably find comparable seasons amongst those 65 years.

        A lot of this could be redundant, if American sports would just have an award called “player of the year/season” instead.

        • hyperbolical@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even better, they could do one for offense and one for defense. Call it offensive/defensive player of the year.

        • ex-apple@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It should be Most Outstanding Player, position agnostic, which would be the player who most far exceeds his peers.

        • Redmangc1@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wasn’t even alive but John Elway winning in 1987 with 23 total TD Is still upsetting, Jerry Rice had 23 total as well.

          Literally only way I see a non QB winning anymore is if a RB breaks the Season TD record , or a defender shatters the Sack/Interception record. And i mean Shatters, by like 5 or 6

            • gyman122@alien.topOPB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is it that crazy if Garrett conceivably gets 23, they have the best defense in at least a decade by most advanced stats, and the QB field at the end of the season is as bleak as it looks now? He’d definitely start getting votes, if only as a protest

              • buffalotrace@alien.topB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes. Bland just set the record for pick 6s in a season. Mccaffrey might score 25 to 30 tds. Hill might have 2k receiving yds.

                He would need score som tds or start going jj watt and swatting passes as well

                • Tyking@alien.topB
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  He had two strip sacks that led to points, including 1 that was recovered in the endzone for a defensive TD, and blocked a field goal which also led to points, all in the same game against the Colts. A game we won by 1 point. And that’s not the only game he’s won for us.

                  • buffalotrace@alien.topB
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    And tj watt scored a td that won a game for the Steelers. He is also not mvp.

                    There are too many offensive players and also another defensive player that would make garrets selection confounding

              • tardigrades2023@alien.topB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You can say that all you want but if the Cowboys were faced with keeping either Bland or Dak, you’d make fun of them for ditching Dak. 5 pick sixes is cool, but in every game he’s had a pick six, they won by double digits. Sure, momentum is a thing, but take last night’s for an example. They win that game whether Bland plays or not. You can’t guarantee that of Dak doesn’t play.

          • JetsFan2003@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In defense of '87 (even though it’s still a travesty Rice didn’t win), the only reason Elway won was because Montana and Rice split the vote due to being on the same team IIRC

        • ELITE_JordanLove@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it’s called MVP and in football by far the most valuable position is QB, so it’s not at all surprising that QBs should win it a lot. OPOY is wide open for non-QBs, especially if they tweaked the rules so you couldn’t vote for the same player at both MVP and OPOY.

          • Flashy-Mcfoxtrot@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The MVP is completely redundant because the All-Pro QB1 is always gonna win. That is why the system about it is flawed.

            Let the most prestigious Awards be for everyone and the lesser awards be for positions.

            • ELITE_JordanLove@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean it has been won by other positions. But saying it’s less prestigious because it’s only won by QBs is a silly argument; as long as it’s called Most Valuable Player it actually should be won by QBs most of the time because QBs are by far the most valuable position. That’s just the nature of the sport. Nobody think the Ballon d’Or is redundant just because 90% of the time an attacking player wins it, they’re just more valuable in general and therefore better seasons are more impressive.

      • Citizen_Snips29@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Forgetting salary cap for a minute, if the Browns could trade Myles Garrett for Patrick Mahomes straight up, right now, do you think they would hesitate for literally even a second?

        • scarrylary@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is the mvp now, who would you trade for in an instant? Cuz if so mahomes should be working on his 7th straight mvp

          • doshegotabootyshedo@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who would be better off, the browns defense without Myles, or the Chiefs offense without Mahomes? There is one objectively true answer here.

            • scarrylary@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The chiefs without mahomes? I’m thinking a few other quarterbacks could average 5 ppg in the second half. The chiefs stil have a top 5 defense. The browns have a bottom 5 offense and are on their 3rd qb of the year.

          • Citizen_Snips29@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you would instantly trade Player B for Player A, then wouldn’t you say that would make Player A more valuable?

            • scarrylary@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay but that’s not how, not has it ever been how the mvp works. Again, if it was, mahomes would have every mvp since he started playing. You think the ravens in 2019 woulda said no to a Lamar for mahomes?

              Or the packers in 2020/21? That’s not how it works. You still have to perform and the chiefs are scoring 5 ppg in the second half right now.

            • scarrylary@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you give the chiefs a league average defense, they’re prolly .500 or worse right now. If you give the browns a league average offense, they’re prolly 9-1

              • C_Colin@alien.topB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They are a league average offense though. Browns are like first in the NFL in the run game (even without Nick Chubb).

        • jand999@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that’s how we should judge MVP. Mahomes would win every year wouldn’t he? Regardless of how he is playing because everyone knows he’s still the best and would trade any player in the league for him.

      • flaccomcorangy@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a really good point. I saw stats from Dak this season and thought he might be a real MVP candidate, just because he’s probably been the best QB statistically. But, has he been an MVP? Man, I don’t think he’s been that good. He just looks good because there’s no real standout at QB. Should he get it over Garrett? Not in my opinion.

        Garrett is on pace for 22 sacks.

    • gyman122@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      See I think JJ losing the MVP in 2012 and 2014 is kind of looked back upon now as missed opportunities, maybe it’s just the kind of media I follow but I think if they had to do it over again a lot of people would have changed their votes.

      Also there’s never quite been a season like this where the progress of defenses have been so stark, and the MVP field from the QB position has been so bad. The story of the season is that defenses finally stepped up to the plate after years of what seemed like exponential growth on offense, and Garrett is the best defensive player in the league on the best defense in the league

      • agk927@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rodgers was more valuable in 2014 than JJ Watt. He did more for his team to win games

        • Brett_Hundley@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unbelievable to me that people think JJ should have been MVP on a team that didn’t make the playoffs.

          • vin1223@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A lot of people have this thing about the mvp where they don’t care about the valuable part of the award and therefore don’t care if the guys team misses the playoffs it’s weird

            • itsthebeans@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think people REALLY want a defensive player to win MVP, to the point where they just ignore any logic around it.

            • atlas_island@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              it’s not that they don’t care, it’s that you can be valuable even if your team is shit. If your team is an 0-16 team without you and you carry them to 8-8 without the ball in your hands every offensive play you’re probably playing out of your mind

      • jfresh42@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to pro football JJ wasn’t even the most valuable defender that year (Sherman). It’s pretty hard to argue against a RB that came within 9 yards of breaking the single season rushing record while also helping his team win 7 more games.

    • agk927@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      2014 Rodgers deserved it over Watt, that was an insane season he put up. Much better season than any qb in the league right now is having

      • scarrylary@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Watts team didn’t even make the playoffs. Browns are at 3 wins max right now without Myles.

      • DryDefenderRS@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying 2014 Watt was more valuable, or even contradicting that QBs should get it.

        I’m saying that if 2012/14 Watt and 2009 Revis weren’t enough, nothing can be.

      • TetrisTech@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing about 2014 is that no player is ever gonna win MVP if their team isn’t in the playoffs, as unfair as that is to Watt

      • The-Implication-0@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s not about how good the defensive player was necessarily in a given year. It’s the combination of a lack of clear cut number 1 QB + insane defensive player this year.

        • agk927@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He was basically the clear cut best qb and had the upper hand over Romo

        • agk927@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Romo was great, but Rodgers did so much more. Plus 38/5 beats out 34/9 any day of the week

          • crash218579@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s true Rodgers had him beat on td-int ratio, but Romo had the higher y/a and passer rating, all while having to deal with Garrett as a coach.

    • buffalotrace@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He isn’t having a historic outlier great season though. It’s not like he is also scoring tds, knocking down a ton of passes, forcing a lot of fumbles, or has ints. He is having a great yr, but you can make a strong case he don’t even the DPOY

    • GoodellsMandMs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      how valuable can you really be if you cant even get your team to the playoffs in the fucking AFCS of all divisions

    • PsychoWarper@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      2009 is the best argument for defenders not being allowed to win, as dominant as JJ was AP not only had a dominant 2000 yard season he also had the story and in 2014 Aaron did throw for 38 TDs to 5 picks.

      This year there isnt really any dominant QB or RB play.

        • PsychoWarper@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My JJ stuff was meant to be reasoning for why it kinda makes sense he didnt win it in 2012, 2009 I do agree is the best example of a weak year where a defensive player maybe should have won it

    • Status-9417@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should accept that MVP is a “QB of the year” award and create next to it a new award (something like “most outstanding player”) for the best player of the season, regardless of position.

        • Status-9417@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thing is, the best QB will always be the “most valuable” player, in the current NFL, over any other position, no matter how outstanding the best Edge, WR or RB of the season might be. QB is a position of such outsized impact on the team, there’s no other parallel in any other team sport.

          The only way to properly recognise and reward excellence in other positions is to get the concept of “valuable” out of the way.

          • BigThurm@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or you separate QBs who have higher positional value, and reward the Most Valuable Players at the other 21 positions. MVQB and MVP.

      • Rkupcake@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps one for offense and one for defense? You could even call them something fun like offensive and defensive player of the year!

      • DryDefenderRS@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d be fine with that (which segues into me forgetting 2021 Cooper Kupp.)

        Again, obviously I’d rather have an elite QB on my team, but if we accept non-QBs can ever win the award under any circumstance, than a 2k receiver is a good choice.

    • Ornery_Gene7682@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I 100% believed that JJ watt deserved MVP in 2014 he was a monster that year sure the Texans sucked but the way he played that year was a whole different level