Hi All. Tried doing some research on the topic of continuing with a photo printing service versus buying a high quality pigment based printer i.e Epson P900 or maybe Canon Pro 300 for something a little smaller. I am an amateur but just really love photography and the artistic expression we all get from the craft. There’s something really special about printing out your photos and seeing the image come back into the real world and make tweaks/edits to how you are shooting and editing. For whatever reason I dont print my work often and thought a home printer would make it more enjoyable and encourage me to print more often.
My big question for those of you out there is your experiences and opinions on the topic and any general advice for consideration. Is getting a home printer worth it or is it just a pain in the ass. I know realistically it’s probably a bit cheaper to use a online service and while there are ton of options for papers and prints, you don’t get the real time feedback/results and it doesn’t feel as gratifying. There are obviously also a ton of monitor calibration variables, ICC profiles, and I assume things that can go wrong, and just general expenses.
If you want many prints (that are not too big) and like printing, then it might be a good idea to get your own. Also it make sit more worth it, if you like using expensive fine art papers, and preferably you want to sell prints if you print yourself. Keep in mind that those papers cost quite a bit, and inks are not free either. For example if you want some really high end A3+ papers from Hahnemuehle, those cost almost 200€ for 25 pack, and you cant get smaller packs, and A4 sizes cost like 75€ for pack of 25, so if you want one type of A3+ paper and two types of A4 papers, thats already 350€, and extra set of inks like 120€, then you might first want some sample pack, and with posts, you are looking at around 500€ besides the printer itself. Ofc you could get cheaper papers, but inks being so expensive, it feels like waste of ink to use cheap papers, also if you just want A4 prints on cheap paper, they dont cost too much from print services, unlike fine art prints, especially larger like A3+ size. If you want A2 or larger prints, then you could use a print service, even if you got your own printer, but if you just want large prints, well then the printer will also cost more, and unless you sell the prints, it could be better to just use printing service. Printers need to be used from time to time, or they use inks to clean and lubricate the machine (or inks might dry up and wreak havoc in the printer). Ofc to save oney, you could cut larger sheets to smaller ones, but if you get A3+, and not A3, cutting it in half wont make it A4 size. But if you get A4 papers, they are easy to cut to A5 or A6 if you want smaller pics. Also for more random prints, it can be a good idea to get a bit cheaper paper. Like if you want to print anything half decent as small pics, then best ones in larger.
Even if you use external print service, you should soft proof your photos, which requires calibrated monitor and ICC profile, some places do however do these adjustments for money, not sure if some have some automated systems to adjust images, either way then you are not in control of how the final image looks like. Personally i think editing for screen is just the first step, sort of like pre-edits and print is the final image if im going to print.
I think having prints definitely adds to the whole photography experience and im sure people would get more out of their hobby if printing was more common, from shop or from your own printer, doesent really matter, but if printing a lot, especially on fine art papers, your own printer will pay for itself quite fast.