return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up1344arrow-down113cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1331arrow-down1external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square40linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareCornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·edit-212 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareAdalast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoCan you tell the employers that? They don’t seem to be getting the memo from all of the strikes.
minus-squareohlaph@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoThey will fight while they still can. But will eventually lose the war.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoWhich is why you’re already seeing a push for AI.
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoAustralia would be reducing in population were it not for immigration, and we’re nowhere near as low as Japan
deleted by creator
Can you tell the employers that? They don’t seem to be getting the memo from all of the strikes.
They will fight while they still can. But will eventually lose the war.
Which is why you’re already seeing a push for AI.
Australia would be reducing in population were it not for immigration, and we’re nowhere near as low as Japan