• ZeroCool@feddit.chOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Plenty of struggling actors have a good work ethic but don’t have powerful/successful mommies and daddies giving them a foot in the door, Meg.

    It’s not dismissive to call him a nepo baby. It’s just a reflection of reality. It doesn’t make him a bad actor, it’s just acknowledging he’s privileged by being the son of two very famous actors. Besides, [puts on Jeff Foxworthy mustache] If the biggest hardship you face in your life is being called a “nepo baby” then you just might be a nepo baby

    • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Hollywood is founded on and fueled by theft of innumerable kinds. This is still talking about celebrities, instead of actionable you’ve for lasting change. Next. 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There is nothing wrong with parents using their influence to help their child. And there is nothing wrong with people pointing it out.

    If the child doesn’t want those easy comparisons they could have done something different than their parents. That’s what most children do who have to brave their own way.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I admire the Hollywood nepo babies who changed their last names to distinguish themselves as an individual rather than linked to their famous parents.

      This Quaid kid obviously did not change his last name.

      • ChexMax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        That only distinguishes them in the public sphere. The people who would help them based on their parentage still know who they are. Imo it’s more about PR than actually shedding their leg up

    • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is nothing wrong with parents using their influence to help their child.

      I’m gonna disagree with you on that one, Hoss. It’s definitely a problem.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Any system one imagines that necessitates that parents won’t do whatever they can to give their kids the best shot, is a fundamentally flawed system.

        • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fuck that nonsense. This is the same mindset as every poor person who thinks of themselves as a “temporarily embarrassed millionaire.” You say it with the assumption that you’re somewhere in that equation and don’t give a shit about any kind of equality. That’s selfish as shit. You phrase it like they should be stopped from helping to make sure their kids are still fed while off at college or some shit, but we’re talking about millionaires helping their millionaire children also maintain their millionaire lifestyle by leveraging their brand to possibly get a role someone without famous parents could use to fucking survive. I don’t care how able he is to do a good job, it’s bullshit to pretend he actually deserves it because his parents really feel like he should.

    • ZeroCool@feddit.chOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Fortunately, I haven’t seen anything that’d suggest he is. And being a nepo baby doesn’t suggest it in and of itself either. Meg’s just pissy because “the little people” are pointing out that her son had access and opportunities that 99.9% of us don’t. He had a leg up on everyone by the circumstances of his birth, it’s just silly to try and handwave it away and pretend he got there purely on merit… It is what it is.

      • Kepabar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        To what end are we bringing it up though?

        Is there a point, or is the only point to degrade the actor in some way?

        I feel this is one of those situations where I can say ‘You aren’t wrong, but you’re an asshole’ if you are bringing it up without a greater reason.

        I don’t think the dude would be ragged on for taking advantage of the opportunity afforded to him.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ahh yes the ol’ “Billionaires work 100,000 times harder then fast food employees” defense.

  • habanhero@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unpopular opinion - sure, it’s fair to point out the privileges that offsprings of Hollywood elites enjoy, but let’s not pretend the term “nepo baby” is not a backhanded sound bite to demean this particular group and devalue them in some way.

    Personally if I’m a Hollywood elite, I’d be less offended if my kid is called “privileged” rather than “nepo baby”, but people choose the latter for this exact reason.