• bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s literally a tool meant to identify you. It listing obvious physical characteristics to describe you makes common sense. Simply having a picture isn’t that descriptive considering it’s just a headshot.

    • CXORA@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Why should a drivers license include more personal information than a passport does?

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        A passport has waaaay more personal info than a driver’s liscense. That’s been part of the move to chipped passports, they can now have basically any biometric data.

        Personally I don’t see an issue with height, weight, eye color, etc. None of that is exactly a secret, a fairly unobtrusive way to narrow down identification. The only thing I think is iffy is address but that’s often out of date anyway. I’ve also only ever heard of that used to mail lost wallets.

          • meliaesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I had to go back to my car for my wallet at Costco recently because I’d lost so much weight since the membership photo was taken in April, they didn’t believe it was me. (60 pounds down!)

        • CXORA@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          My point is, it’s more information than is required.

          In the interests of privacy we should be required to provide only the minimum necessary detail.