• machinin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You know, those dirty dark-skinned people might have sexually corrupted those ethnically pure wome. It’s one of the strongest primal tropes for propaganda use.

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Since when does Hamas give a shit about public perception??? Rape and murder are fine but they draw the line when Kentucky Karen clutches pearls?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      OP is radically pro-Israel. They did everything they could to avoid admitting that it was bad to bomb refugees, especially after telling them to go and then bombing them when they go there. They just kept talking about bad things Hamas did as if that justified bombing refugees. All I can think is they don’t consider Palestinians to be human.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Media bias / fact check for The Messenger:

    Overall, we rate The Messenger Right-Center biased based on story selection and editorial perspectives that moderately favor the right. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to the use of poor sources, sensationalized content, and one-sided reporting.

      • Froyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Trump said we could cure Covid by drinking bleach and shoving UV lights up our ass. That doesn’t make it true and it makes anyone repeating it sound like a jackass.

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe, but that’s not how the article is framed.

        Personally, I don’t think someone spouting off should be repeated. Good journalism would be investigating and verifying the claim.

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          He’s a government spokesman. Good journalism is to quote him directly, which they did. Quotation marks and everything.

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Good journalism would be not quoting and repeating unsubstantiated claims at all.

            Unless you’re going to write an article saying “spokesman makes wild and unsubstantiated claims at press conference”.