• Aleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s sure beneficial for the rich fucks behind these companies. Everyone else gets fucked.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      No, that’s not any of this works. In a free market, it’s entirely possible (and often the case) that both the rich fucks and everyone else benefit.

      I recommend Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell and also Poor Economics by Abhijit V. Banerjee.

      edit Based on the voting response, I guess I should have suggested something from Dr. Seuss first.

      • Aleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Then pray tell, how is private equity purchasing homes benefiting everyone else?

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          It increases the overall supply, brings more resources and stability to the housing market. Corporations that specialize in house rental have a opportunity to view market data. All this combined benefits everybody.

          • rainynight65@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Only if these corporations are actually required by regulation to make these houses available for rent, and at market-adequate rates. If a company is as cashed up as this one is likely to be, they’ll only rent to people who are willing to pay higher rents, and if there’s nobody who wants to rent a specific property, they’d rather leave it sitting vacant than lower the rent.

            This isn’t hypothetical, it’s happening in practically every property market where wealthy investors are buying up housing stock.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That is true. Protecting the free market is one of the few legitimate roles of the government.