Title. “lmao internet points” and all, but what is the point of participating in a community that sees assumptions and other commonly non-harmful commentaries/posts as “bad” this easily? Do folks in here are really that needy of self-validation, even if it means seeking such from something completely insignificant like internet points? I mean, if I wanted to have a “stepping on eggs” experience with someone (i.e “one false step, and everything breaks apart”), I’d look for a random chick to meet in a bar.

That, or “we reddit now”.

  • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    See? I didn’t consider your post harmful, but I did consider it worthy of a downvote, simply due to how I felt it contributed to the discussion.

    And people who don’t feel like I’m contributing meaningfully can downvote my posts. Almost as if that was the point of the button, to give an indicator of how much readers liked or disliked the content.

    Negative opinions are every bit as valid as positive ones. Even more so in a culture where criticism is considered “rude” and socially suppressed.

      • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It is criticism, and certainly from a subjective standpoint it’s very valid criticism

        But I’m free to downvote criticism I don’t like or agree with 😁just like you’re free to downvote a comment you felt was rude, in addition to pointing that out. It would also mean something different if you didnt downvote but also commented that I was being rude.

        Almost like the downvote was providing useful information

        • sour@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          how about no being rude

          where criticism is considered rude