The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They brought upon themselves an unusual position of ruling on abortion access even after its conservative majority declared that it would leave that question to the states.

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 year ago

      To which it isn’t authorized to rule because that falls to the FDA. They are religious zealots and not qualified to rule on medicine.

      • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If this is actually successful, expect republicans to begin going after more fda approvals in the courts for things like hiv medications or vaccines. Anything that appeals to their religious zealot base, doesn’t matter how many people they harm.

        Edit: Didn’t think of this originally, and not strictly related to abortion access debate, but the ruling as it stands could allow for pharmaceutical companies to sue each other and try to overturn the approvals of competitors’ drugs. It’s just such an unfathomably bad ruling on soooooo many levels.

    • tygerprints@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet most everyone amongst us, you know us lowly civilians, actually want women to have abortion rights. The conservatives who represent us are not in any hurry to actually represent us at all, and seem only interested in doing the diametrically opposite of what people who elect them want them to be doing. Maybe it’s time to stop electing self-serving bastards - just a thought.