The question has been framed in the streets: is a government that impoverishes healthcare and nutrition, flouts the law, enriches its officials, imprisons babies, and kills its citizens worth the money it collects, much less the respect and obedience it demands?

Democrats have nothing to lose by shutting down the government to force the majority party to respond to these questions and the one that looms over all: what, if any, is the political and moral future of the US?

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Specially the RNC branch of the DNC. Specially important to not allow people with repeated last names or family ties to be president. There’s plenty of last names that haven’t had a turn at being president. Also we need a woman president and quick!

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The Democrats faux concerned the air traffic controllers not working and not being paid, to kowtow to the Republicans in the last shutdown. The Dems had its members “break rank” who happened to be politicians, whose election won’t be coming soon or are retiring. The Democrats will pull the same manipulative tactics. They won’t be in this game for so long if they are not that devious.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But the Democrats insist that it wasn’t working, so naturally we have to let the fascist murdering Republicans do whatever the fuck they want!

  • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago
    1. Shut down the US government.
    2. Each state puts forth a new constitution elevating themselves to country status.
    3. Form a new North American Union (like the EU) with Canada as Daddy
    4. ???
    5. Profit
    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Each state puts forth a new constitution elevating themselves to country status.

      I hope my state can successfully wage war against every state to the south of it.

    • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      While my theory is based on various sci-fi so should be taken with a mine of salt, my guess is that USA will split into three different countries: NUSA (lol Cyberpunk) which will comprise of the original 13 colony states and the upper North East, The California Republic which will essentially be the West and NW and in good relations with NUSA but with different legislature, and the South which might be called anything from Texas, New Texas, Republic of Texas, or New Louisiana Territory, which will essentially be a war-torn area full of religious extremists not unlike Middle-Eastern areas after the West had their way with them. It will be full of forever wars by religious factions funded by the MIC shareholders of various other countries but in the public face it’ll be covered by the media as religious extremism and/or patriotic fanaticism while ignoring the material reality and history of the situation.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In the American Civil War the North had the advantage in Navy, population, wealth, and industrial power.

        Now those advantages in population and industrial capacity are flipped. In the scenario you project the south could devolve into infighting and hollow out, but a single charismatic figure could unite them, and that would pose a terrible threat to the NEUSA and the Cali Republic. Have you read Rurtledove’s American Front?

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It really depends on what type of war this hypothetical civil war would be, and who would be included in each side. North Dakota has nukes, is in the North, but also is very conservative. Opposite scenario for New Mexico

          Realistically, a conventional war isn’t possible these days. In digital warfare, tech hubs like NYC, DC, Cali, and Washington become the most important locations

        • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I have not read that, no. I have heard of the series before though.

          Does the South really have those things flipped? Does the South really have more of a population that the East and West coasts combined? More land area sure, but aren’t they currently at the economic mercy of the East and West coasts?

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      2 would mostly only happen in red states. The rest mostly know how to cooperate.

      And you know that California doesn’t need Canada, even less when you consider the rest of the US west coast in with it.

    • ferretfacefrankburns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Canada doesn’t want to babysit you guys. Seriously, every time a yankee doodle dipshit proposes Canada to take over some US states, it just sounds like immature fuckups who don’t want to take responsibility for yourself and move out of your parent’s basement.

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Some states have proven that, without federal intervention, they cannot effectively govern themselves. Texas, for instance…

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Texas would last long enough to be dangerous to it’s neighbors. I would not want to be in New Mexico if federal power breaks down.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Probably better to form an analogy to the old European Coal and Steel Community rather than to jump directly into an EU equivalent, also bring Mexico in since without the US being a thing they’ll end up with the largest population on the continent.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Prolly. Doesn’t mean I shouldn’t point out viability, fate has a strange way of twisting and if it so decides I would rather have the idea spread than for it to not. Who knows perhaps someone will read my comment and spread it further or be in a position to enact.

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you don’t feel like your representatives are adequately representing you (God knows I don’t), this is a good time to find a primary candidate to support (monetarily or with your time) - or even file to run yourself. Every house representative is up for reelection in November.

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Shut it the fuck down until the weasels in the GOP actually have their arm twisted to engage with empathy. I’d be personally affected by a shutdown, but it’s a sacrifice I’d make for a long time if it means any kind of progress against the fucking fascist pedophile protectors in office.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No taxation without representation. We know Trump/ Elon / Putin hacked the election. This is NOT the will of the American people. Cut them off of our tax dollars. They want small government so bad, see what they can do without revenue from blue cities/ states.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      16 hours ago

      IIRC, he’s starting negotiations in the middle and is eager to give up even more.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Man, I wish Democrats were the heartless, scheming, cut-throat, socialist maniacs that I was told they were growing up in a Republican household…

        The country would be in much better shape if it were true…

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Here’s the thing, they are, possibly even better than republicans, they’re taking the same corporate pro israel bribe money, they just didn’t also align themselves with the insane neo Nazis, Christian terrorists, and loudmouth idiots.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You forgot the part where I said “socialist.” I don’t want them to be heartless and scheming if they’re not doing it for socialist reforms.

            • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              You are correct, I did in fact miss that. Shouldn’t be trying to be thoughtful while I’m in bed trying to sleep 😅

              And hell yeah, the only reform is socialist reform. It’s unfortunate that the party is almost all corpo Dems, definitely needs more push from the left