An early version of Disney’s Mickey Mouse will enter the public domain on January 1 | CNN Business
www.cnn.com
For nearly a century, the image of Mickey Mouse has been married to Disney’s brand, but in 2024, the copyright of Disney’s first film featuring Mickey will expire.

In just a few short days, an early version of Disney’s most iconic character will join the public domain for the first time.

For nearly a century, the image of Mickey Mouse has been married to the Walt Disney Company brand, but on January 1, 2024, Disney’s copyright of “Steamboat Willie,” Walt Disney’s first short film featuring Mickey Mouse, will expire.

That means that one of the company’s earliest iterations of its beloved rodent will become available for public use.

…

“Steamboat Willie” premiered in 1928, helping launch Mickey Mouse and Walt Disney into the stratosphere. Since US copyright law, which was last updated by Congress in 1998, allows copyright to be held for 95 years, Disney’s sole claim to the character is about to end.

  • skydivekingair@lemmy.world
    17·
    10 months ago

    When my kid did a play in middle school “The Little Mermaid” either there was an approved videographer or none were allowed, either way parents were told if they took cell phone footage the school would be sued.

    I wonder if that kind of thing should fall under educational purposes?

    • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      101·
      10 months ago

      From the American Association of Community Theatre:

      Is it legal to videotape a performance of a play or musical protected under copyright? In almost all cases, the answer is no.

      …

      That’s because the only authority that authors generally give publisher/agents is to license performance rights. (In the case of musicals these are known as “grand rights,” because they include book, music, and lyrics.)

      https://aact.org/sites/default/files/Resource Library/Videotaping.pdf

      • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
        7·
        10 months ago

        Can’t find the video by lawful masses explaining the specific components but if I recall correctly copyright is a bundle of rights.

        You have and can sell, give or license them together or separately.

        • The right to reproduce/copy
        • The right to perform
        • The right to transmit
        • The right to create derivatives.

        So, outside fair use which isn’t as slam dunk as people think and you still have to fight in court to prove you had a right at your own expense, copyright holders can give some rights but not others. And unless explicitly stated the rights can be assigned to you but you can’t grant them to others. E.g. the schools allowed to perform it, but can’t give rights to parents to record it.

        You can make as many copies of my poem you want. But you can’t change the wording. (Limited reproduction allowed, derivatives not)

        You print my poem in your book and change the wording but it can’t be streamed, projected, performed. (Reproduction, derivatives allowed, performance not)

        You can perform my music on a stage with lyrics but you can’t let them be photocopied/streamed. (Performance allowed, reproduction not)

        It all makes sense when the copyrights are for a short time. They’re meant to be a creative monopoly incentivizing people putting stuff out there and then it being part of the public domain after a time.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      1·
      10 months ago

      The Little Mermaid isn’t copyrighted though…

      Unless they pull Hans Christian Anderson out of his grave, I’m not sure they would have much standing to sue. The only way I could see a lawsuit is if they had exact imagery from the movie.

      • skydivekingair@lemmy.world
        2·
        10 months ago

        Maybe it wasn’t the little mermaid? Or they were using the names. It was awhile ago, what stuck with me is we weren’t allowed to record the performance for that reason. Maybe I’d remember the play better if I had a video of it lol.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          2·
          10 months ago

          Haha

          It could also very possibly be an overzealous administration who didn’t want to deal with any possible issues. They maybe knew of the Disney version but we’re not aware that most of Disney’s biggest movies are from pre-copyright stories.