P2P network with no servers. Added “communities” with Facebook-like posts (my preference). Looks cool but it’s missing a lot of details and it seems like there’s almost no one using it at the moment, despite feeling very polished.

          • ninchuka@lemmy.oneM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            no one said it doesnt exist, just we cant see it and read it ourselves to verify its doing what its saying its doing

            • HughJanus@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              no one said it doesnt exist,

              That’s incorrect. The person I replied to said it didn’t exist.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                1 year ago

                “No Source Code”

                Forgive me if my English was too casual/ambiguous. All programs have source code somewhere. I was trying to indicate it wasn’t available on the website.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Source code exists for all programs. Sure. Did the developers of this program make their code available somewhere? i can’t prove they didn’t, but they are not helping by not making it clearly available.

            If you want people to trust/use a new privacy focused end to end encrypted protocol/program then code must be released for people to have any hope of trusting you.

            Otherwise your just yet another facebook clone.

            At this point with the code not readily available, my advice is to forget about this project.

            P.S. If the developer released their code on a old usb-stick duct taped to the back of a wawa bathroom toilet on a new jersey turnpike… they are only demonstrating how far from the privacy mindset they really are.

  • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dev’s email is gmail. First red flag. And their social media profile are Twitter, Instagram and Facebook. Not to mention that all I can read about their “protocol” is shitty marketing speak. There’s no technical whitepaper. And there’s no code. It seems to be proprietary software which is enough reason to run away from it. Together with the rest of things, it looks like either it’s a honeypot or (more probably) a fake privacy initiative trying to grab some money/data from non technical users

  • Sleepkever@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The biggest red flag is probably that they claim to just be the WireMin protocol, but haven’t published any protocol specifications. In the spirit of open and unmoderated communication I would hope they would at least publish their protocol specifications, even if they won’t opensource their own client for it.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      as it’s usually the case with these shady proprietary super duper secure messengers they probably don’t have a protocol of their own. The dev probably took any other IMs source code, made a few changes to the UI and now is trying to grab some cash or data from the few people that install it.