Marijuana has a lower potential for abuse than other drugs that are subjected to the same restrictions, with scientific support for its use as a medical treatment, researchers from the US Food and Drug Administration say in documents supporting its reclassification as a Schedule III substance.

Marijuana is currently classified as Schedule I, reserved for the most dangerous controlled substances, including heroin and LSD. In 2022, President Joe Biden asked US Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and the attorney general to begin the administrative process of reviewing how marijuana is scheduled under federal law. HHS Assistant Secretary for Health Adm. Rachel Levine wrote a letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration in August in which she supported the reclassification to Schedule III, a list that includes “drugs with a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence” such as ketamine, testosterone and Tylenol with codeine.

Rescheduling marijuana could open up more avenues for research, allow cannabis businesses to bank more freely and openly, and have firms no longer subject to a 40-year-old tax code that disallows credits and deductions from income generated by sales of Schedule I and II substances.

  • tory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s about it. I am getting a good amount of pushback from people who very much like the idea that being able to dream again and not being high are withdrawl.

    And sure, they’re all technically correct in the most pedantic way.

    • chocosoldier@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      longtime user here, i tuck in with a bowl every night, and every morning i wake up with a dream still dancing in my head. when i go on a break i don’t “start dreaming again”, I have extremely vivid and bizarre dreams for like a week and then it settles back to normal. Drugs have more effect on dreaming than just “stop” and “go”. I suspect the issue is less others being pedantic and more you being unwilling to challenge a deeply oversimplified take.

      • tory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow, you remember vivid dreams. That’s clearly withdrawl.

        …In the most technical sense, only. You’re technically correct, the best form of correct. Which is pretty much the definition of pedantry.

        • chocosoldier@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you seem like a very informed and educated person. please, do continue gatekeeping the term “withdrawl” based on your rigorous and well-sourced scientific definitions - oops I’m sorry, I mean petty judgment, scorn, and dismissiveness toward anyone who uses language appropriately despite your weird feelings about how words ought to be used. I’m sure you were a joy to have in class. Do you also have a breakdown about pedantry when the dictionary definition of a word isn’t what you feel like it should be?

            • chocosoldier@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re just straight up provoking me now without even the pretense of trying to make any kind of point, so I’m going to just hit that block button and be done with this exchange.