Data on search engine market share is available, but I wonder what that looks like for Lemmy users in particular, who I would assume lean more technical than the average user, so probably use DuckDuckGo and alternates more than Google.

I use a mix of DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I’ll also use ChatGPT, which can be good if you’re careful to verify the answers it gives you as a check against hallucinations. It’s useful for short, direct answers without ads or SEO bullshit.

This article on Ars (and if you’re not a subscriber, you absolutely should be, as they are the best tech journalists out there) inspired the question: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/06/google-admits-reddit-protests-make-it-harder-to-find-helpful-search-results

Fucking Reddit. Enshittification ruins everything.

  • ian@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://www.marginalia.nu/

    Currently down for updates, but does a great job of avoiding SEO abuse/blog spam/etc. Takes you back to the earlier days of the internet when it felt like there were more forums/individual sites/etc. They’re still out there, just hidden under all the junk.

  • Kir@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why lots of you answer with chatGPT. It’s not a search engine! And you shouldn’t use it like a search engine.

    • NeonWoofGenesis@kek.henlo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see a usecase for where you don’t know where to start or search with, and then verify with actual searches.

      I recently used it to explain for a friend what is the difference between wheat and ale beer, and it gave a very good summary. With DDG I might not get a direct explanation and would need to read a few articles and then word them in a comprehensive way.

    • 雨 月@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe people mainly search for answers to simple daily life questions or something.

      • Kir@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess, but it’s still not a search engine and I think it’s a bit problematic if that’s the usecase.

    • tenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it IS a search engine and that’s basically all it’s good for. By its very nature all it can do is collate information. It’s the only thing AI is good at.

      • Kir@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No it’s not. To search is a specific task, and generative AI can’t do that. It can fulfill some need that we are used to fulfill by searching the web, but this doesn’t mean it’s a search engine.

        If you lost the key of your car and have access to an AI that can (sometimes) start your can without a key, you can be happy about it, but you still can’t say the AI searched the key for you. It can’t do it.

        Edit: btw, we are talking about generative AI here. I’m not saying there isn’t and could not be a search engine that use AI to better its result.

          • Kir@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do you have to answer like that?

            You are linking a search engine based on generative AI, which is a different things than using chatgpt per sè and, as I was saying to another user, I did not know existed.

            If you don’t like my answer you can simply not comment on that. I don’t care if you agree with me or not, be polite

            • newde@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t worry, you are in the right: a LLM is not a search engine. You might integrate it into a search engine, but that doesn’t make it a search engine.

              I mean it’s so glaringly obvious it is not a search engine: every time you ask ChatGPT for information it will give you a disclaimer it’s database is from 2021 and prior…

  • Silejonu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    DuckDuckGo, but mostly because of the !bangs. I do 90% of my searches through StartPage (!s), and the rest directly on a few websites (Wikipedia, YouTube, Arch wiki…).

    • ayla [she/her]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched to DDG almost entirely because of the !w bang — Google massively downranking/hiding Wikipedia links made it a lot less useful to me.

    • Ashtear@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, the bangs are a game changer! They even work well on niche sites like Jisho and Scryfall.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bangs to search Scryfall might actually be a selling point for me. I’ve been experimenting with Kagi, seems like it also supports that as well. This is amazing, thank you for this useful information. :D

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use mostly either ddg or brave search. I miss the google of pre 2010, when the majority of its results were good.

    I also use Yandex whenever I’m looking for pirate stuff, the only engine that doesn’t block those kinds of results.

  • sorchist@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using DuckDuckGo since, at least 2010, maybe earlier. If its results aren’t up to snuff, I’m not aware of that because they’re what I’m used to. I fall through to Google ( !g) if I think there might be more out there. The bang commands are so good. I use DDG as my main search in my search bar and then I can use the bang commands to get to whatever specialized search I want from there. It’s a meta-search-engine.

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Self-hosted Searxng. It’s shared to multiple people which kills a lot of the usefulness in Google or others trying to track my instance.

    • copylefty@lemmy.fosshost.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I tried this, but it kept saying ‘Engine failed’ or something on every other search. I never could figure out why. I might try again

      Edit: Actually it was Searx I used. I’ll spin up Searxng and see if it’s improved

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had some issues with searx… Things are a bit better in my experience with searxng. Sometimes I still run into the error messages. But usually it’s my fault more than anything (server bogged down, too many requests/searches across all my users, or internet blips)… I just rerun the search a few seconds later and it’s usually good again.

    • Ix9@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I know a lot of folks don’t like the results, but to be honest, I don’t find Google any better these days.

    • MrStetson@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Qwant is the best one i’ve come across

      • Mainly uses its own index but might also query from Bing with pseudonymous data
      • No sponsored links or sensoring
      • Good image search
      • Integrated maps that uses OpenStreetMap
  • kamen@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using DuckDuckGo as my main search engine for the past couple of years. I occasionally fall back to Google.

  • Gimletson@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    DuckDuckGo for general searches
    Google for image searches
    Google maps for local businesses (including their website)
    BingGPT for simple research answers (e.g. What door closers will fit on a Norton 1600 bolt pattern?)

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Ecosia for a while and liking it. I think the results are usually better than Google and the image search is way more useful, still gives you direct links to the image files. Though most importantly I like planting trees.