I’m wondering what the current favorite distros are besides the most popular ones like Arch, Debian and Fedora.

  • synthsalad@mycelial.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alpine.

    I’m a longtime Arch user, and would have preferred to use Arch on a particular system, but didn’t want to deal with needing to babysit ZFS packages from AUR.

    So, I decided to use Alpine after never having tried it before, and ended up sticking with it. Like Arch, it’s both lightweight and has a capable/sensible package manager, which are the main things that are important to me.

    I haven’t had any growing pains from Alpine’s use of busybox/musl/openrc, things mostly Just Work!

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will bite you after a while. I remember using alpine in a docker image many years ago and running a python program that needed some modules installed, where one of them required compiling c code. Naturally that didnt work on alpine since its using its own c library. So couldn’t run the python app at all on alpine.

  • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gentoo. It’s amazingly customisable, easy to configure and write packages for, has an extraordinarily good wiki (and installation instructions), and is always seeing new and active development.

    There is also official binary package support for architectures as of recently too, which makes it easy to mix and match compiling from source and binary packages.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep, for me the most exciting moment in 2024 will be Cosmic being released and partly also the release of KDE 6, even though that probably won’t be a big deal. Just nice to use qt 6 I guess. It doesn’t have any new features really.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we allow derivatives, I’d say SteamOS despite being Arch. It’s putting Linux in non-technical people’s literal hands and it’s not a locked down and completely different platform that happens to run Linux like Android is. It’s almost designed by Valve to give people a taste of Linux by the addition of its desktop mode, and people that would be modding consoles are now modding SteamOS and learning how much fun an open platform can be. I’ve seen people from sales talk about their Decks on my work Slack.

    Otherwise, NixOS, no contest. It’s been a really long time since we’ve last seen a fundamentally different distro that’s got some real potential. For the most part, Arch, Debian and Fedora do similar things with varying degrees of automation and preconfiguring your packages, but they’re still very package oriented. We’ve been mostly slapping tools like Ansible to really configure them to our liking reproducibly, answer files if your package manager has something like that. And then NixOS is like, what if the entire system was derived from evaluating a function, and and the same input will always result in the exact same system? It’s incredibly powerful especially when maintaining machines at scale. Updates are guaranteed to result in the exact same configuration, and they’re atomic too, no halfway updated system the user unplugged the system in the middle of.

    • MrScruff@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen people from sales talk about their Decks on my work Slack.

      Read in an New Zealand accent this is classic Sales.

  • Vinegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    DietPi! It’s one the most resource efficient distros that is easy to set up. It’s ideal for single board computers and virtual machines, so I use it as a low-overhead Docker host on my Raspberry Pis. The dietpi-software tool installs optimized versions of most software you might use for SBC projects, but if it doesn’t have what you’re looking for, you can also use APT to install packages from the Debian ARM/ Raspbian repos.

  • AccelShark@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been using Xubuntu 23.10 recently, but I’m kind of a distro hopper. I need ROCm and some other special (proprietary, ehh) tools that require RHEL, SLE, or some Ubuntu flavor. I also like having a working out-of-the-box configuration. I’ve used openSUSE Tumbleweed and Arch Linux before, might try it again but it’s a little bit complicated to me.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    OpenSUSE Leap, has been a solid 7 year run, with flawless updates. And no graphics issues because nVidia hosts their own repo for the gpu drivers.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    OpenSUSE Tumbleweed has been my desktop home for the last year. It’s very up to date, yet it’s somehow solid and reliable despite sometimes receiving hundreds of updates per week. And if anything goes wrong with an update you can easily roll back to a BTRFS snapshot. It has a good repository supplemented by Flatpaks, and I haven’t had any problems finding software, yet it’s not a hassle like some other cutting-edge distros. It uses KDE Plasma by default, which I consider a plus. I came to it from Mint, which was my go-to distro for a long time, but I enjoy Tumbleweed more for its up-to-dateness and configurability, and I have (surprisingly) encountered more software gaps on Mint.

  • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m trying out OpenSUSE Tumbleweed on a few personal servers as I wait for Slowroll, I want to get back to trying to get Gentoo running, and I should check out Guix as a server in a VM.

    Gentoo having a binary option should help since I seem to mess up the kernel part of the installation.

    • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use the bin kernel. I don’t change anything that is kernel level, so the default is fine. It cuts down on updates and install by a lot, but more important is that it’s stable. I personally love gentoo, it’s my favorite and I’ve tried basically everything.

  • Deebster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can it still be a favourite if I haven’t touched it in a decade? I still love Gentoo but I have enough shiny things to burn up my time.

  • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    NixOS for me. It’s a package manager (a very nice, declarative one) that you can use on any Linux (or Mac), and there’s also an entire distro based on it.

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bazzite. It’s based on Fedora uBlue so it’s technically Fedora, but being an immutable OS, it works quite differently enough that it counts as its own distro. For instance, you don’t use dnf or yum to install stuff, you’d use Flatpak/Distrobox/Nix. Updates are done using the rpm-ostree command, and it’s effectively a rolling release model, but atomic in nature so you get none of the instability that you’d get in a typical rolling release.