Windows: 277 Linux: 298

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        How is there not an Arch-derived distro that uses a cat in the shape of the Arch logo for their logo?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I did think of that one after. It’s still not a cat arching it’s back, like the pictures above, though. Those cats are so close to being in the shape of the Arch logo that someone should make a cat Arch logo.

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think it’s an AUR package you can download and configure, probably the one that caused all the security issues for AUR the other week.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    In many games it does, but I’m not sure this comparison is a good example of that, as it shows persistent CPU stutter on Linux. With those spikes, Windows would be the smoother experience even if the average frametimes are slightly better on Linux.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      As I… think has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread, you can run Gamescope + Proton + Wayland, and force the refresh rate.

      You can do this with xrandr or sometimes some games actually expose it as a thing you can directly configure.

      Presumably, you could set this to, for this example, 90, and probably help out the frame timing variance a bit.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 days ago

    Didn’t valve test this sort of thing over a decade ago and found Linux to easily get better performance?

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    I feel like people don’t believe me when I tell them this is the case. Always glad to see evidence.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    ITT: OP learns why reviewers take days to provide benchmarks for games. If you don’t come with receipts, it’s death by a thousand buts.

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I once posted on /r/MacGaming how pleased I was that I could run Horizon Zero Dawn on my M2 Air using Crossover, and how it seemed (to me) to run better than on my massive, old, water-cooled PC with an Nvidia GTX1060. I wasn’t getting 120fps or anything, in fact, it was closer to 20fps at times. But I was running HZD on a fanless laptop, on an architecture on which it was never designed to run.

      Foolishly, I was expecting a chorus of folks saying “yeah, cool, nice!”, but what I actually got were a bunch of folks demanding proof.

      So I closed Reddit, because it wasn’t worth the arsehole.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    Doesn’t seem to happen going by the graphs included, but one thing I look in benchmarks is not how fast or not a program was, but how frequent spikes and hiccups in speed are. Having played games at 11 FPS but that were consistent at that and seemingly weren’t lagging (variable max fps?), big numbers don’t tell much imo.

    Also, statistically, one single benchmark, and from an unamed game at that, doesn’t tell much either. If I might suggest, maybe do like the microblogging folks and start a responses/quoting thread of more tests?