• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    2 days ago

    While I was taught that in elementary school, I was also taught about the 3/5ths compromise as early as middle school. By the time high school rolled around I was being taught about reconstruction and the corrupt bargain of 1877. I guess I’m lucky I got a good education in the north because I am aware that’s not necessarily the standard nationally.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was also taught these things in the south, living in North Florida. As part of a 1 semester Florida history class in middle school, we also went into each of the spanish conquistadors and how they murdered their way across the continent.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      My AP history teacher gave us copies of Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States as a supplemental to our textbooks. She was an awful teacher overall, but I appreciated her trying to make sure we had multiple perspectives.

      Then I went to an elite east-coast private college, where I almost failed US History because I called the professor out for teaching Lost Cause bullshit.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Any academic peddling lost cause bullshit is a complete joke. Just curious, were they from the south?

        • tmyakal@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Of course they were.

          He also characterized the 2000 election as “a perfect tie” that could’ve just as easily been decided by a coinflip instead of the more historically agreed upon view of the Supreme Court ratfucking Florida’s recount.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah we talked about colonialism in my middle school.

      However, it was discussed as a fact of history and we went into detail about the slave trade triangle and all that.

      And we did it without politicizing it. It was facts-based rather than pushing some weird political narrative about how america is heroic, or america is evil. Fancy that… just teaching history.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sometimes moralizing is necessary. In Canada we had one teacher go into detail on the kidnapping of indigineous children and the residential schools they were sent to where they were often beaten or raped. I’m glad that teacher did that since many of my contemporaries were not aware of that history and some remain oblivious into adulthood. There’s nothing worse for a nation than people having a false sense of pride in it (as we’re seeing in the US currently).

        • AskewLord@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          In Canada we had one teacher go into detail on the kidnapping of indigineous children and the residential schools they were sent to where they were often beaten or raped

          That isn’t moralizing dude. That’s just telling facts.

          The moralizing/politicizing part is when you tell the kids that it’s their fault and they should feel bad about it. It isn’t, and they shouldn’t.