Whelp, here we go again

  • that_one_guy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did all these tech companies just get together and decide to fuck us over around the same time? Seriously, what is going on with all these companies rolling out hugely unpopular new rules/changes all on one another’s heels?

  • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I’d rather pay for Nebula than YouTube premium. Most of the creators I actively follow are on there anyways, and the few that aren’t (usually the ones with very long videos) I should probably just watch with ads anyways to support them.

    • ErgodicTangle@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a similar thought. How fair is nebula to their creators? I heard it was somehow creator owned, but other than that I have no idea how it works.

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    And what are the consequences of “strikes”? Will you delete my Google account, including my email, and also screw up my Android phone and my kids Chromebook?

    It’s scary to realize that Google has me by the balls here. They can screw me in so many ways, and screw my family members as well. I’d rather have my bank credentials stolen than my email credentials, at least I can get real customer service from the bank, I can even go to a physical location and speak face-to-face with someone who can help me. Google wont give me customer support, and my email account is the closest thing to an identity I have for most businesses I interact with.

    It takes a lot of work to avoid Google. Yes, there are alternatives, but in D&D terms, avoiding Google is like a -2 to all stats for your entire life, and not something we can expect the general population to do.

    All this shows the need for anti-trust enforcement. The same company is controlling too much. Bust 'em up!

    • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Moral of the story: create separate account for YouTube that has no high value services or data on it.

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d argue the bigger moral is that you should always own your online identity. You should buy your own domain (@yourname.xyz or something like that) and make your email on that. So if Google bans you, you just switch email providers and keep your address.

        • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been using @fixnum.org and since a few years the alias @wim.land to do exactly this, but that’s just email.

          My app purchases, photo storage, and YouTube account are all entangled in this. I could decouple from Google, but it would be very painful.

    • GravityAce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spend a weekend degoogling your stuff. There are alternatives for everything now. No regrets

    • somniumx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the reason I’m hesitant to use a VPN for yt Premium from a cheap country. The lingering thought of losing my Gmail and android access…

    • jon@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article suggests you simply get blocked from watching additional videos. But there’s no info on how that works- is it account based? IP based? Can I wipe my YouTube cookies to bypass a block?

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently found this gem: https://adnauseam.io/

    It’s an ad blocker that only hides ads and clicks them for you in the background, which means you waste advertiser’s money, support creators, can’t get flagged for ad blocking as easily, and they can’t build a proper profile against your ad activity since it’s all noise. Haven’t installed it yet, but this might be the push I needed.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This might be an acceptable sollution, but what happens on the other side of the ad? If something maliciously is being spreaded, the click might have to happen in an isolated form from the rest of the system or the browser.

    • itsmect@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The question is: How much data about me and my browser does clicking on the ads leak? I’m using libre wolf with additional hardening, including noscript, and I suspect that clicking on ads will not even register with the ad company?

  • daveyeah@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mmmm, gotta love that enshittification strategy every big tech company is working on right now.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone in the Fediverse (I don’t know where and who) posted that you have to add the following filters into U-Block Origin. When done you shouldn’t see any anti-adblock-warnings :

    youtube.com##+js(set,yt.config_.openPopupConfig.supportedPopups.adBlockMessageViewModel,false)
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,Object.prototype.adBlocksFound,O)
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,ytplayer.config.aras.raw_player_response.adPlacements,[])
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,Object.prototype.hasAllowedlnstreamAd,true)
    

    I might add that I haven’t experienced any anti-adblock-warnings yet, but I added these filters in advance. I might be worth a shot!

  • liminis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another executive-driven decision by people who clearly don’t use their own product (kinda impressive really when it’s YT).

    I can’t help wonder if they saw an uptick in adblocking as a result of their absurd increases in ad-time recently and somehow thought this was a reasonable solution.

  • ram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll stop blocked ads when I stop using their service. Not a minute sooner.

  • NoTime@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What happens if you use SmartTubeNext on a TV? I’m assuming the interface wouldn’t support the 3 strike YouTube popup so I guess you’d just get blocked without knowing why?

    I’m guessing ReVanced will support the popup so you’d know.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ad blocker detection is not new, and other publishers regularly ask viewers to disable ad blockers

    “everyone else is treating their customers like garbage, so they don’y hold it against us”.

    Yes, we can.

    I didn’t block when you had 5 second ads. I didn’t block when you had 15 second ads. I started blocking when you’d play 2+ unskippable 15 second ads back-to-back. I didn’t mind sitting through an ad when I appreciate the service you offered. Now, you’re just being greedy, and I will go to great lengths to damage your bottom line as notably as I can.

  • JillyB@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take: this sucks, but YouTube premium is legit. I wish more platforms offered a paid, ad-free way to interact. I don’t feel like figuring out a way around ads but I’m not about to start watching them. So I pay a few bucks a month.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be more willing to pay if it wasn’t $10/mo (annual cost) for a bunch of stuff I don’t care about. If they had a cheaper option that was just ad-free (maybe $5/mo?), I’d be down for that.

      I also like what Kagi does with their duo plan for 2 users. Some kind of duo plan for YT premium would be nice as well, since I (and many others, I’m sure) don’t have a family of 6 people.

    • popshabang@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind paying for services I use to avoid my data being the payment (like Kagi or Protonmail).

      But I don’t like the idea of paying Google AND having my data farmed.

    • shufflerofrocks@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s simply a more honest model - you get content, they get money.

      I would love to be able to pay for an ad-free experience for the various websites and services that I browse and use in a straightforward way instead of being leeched for ad-revenue

      • anon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t doubt paying a hundred per month to have an ad-free life.

        no ads on tv or sports, no billboards, no ads on buses. it would be awesome

    • kukkurovaca@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have any philosophical objection for paying to use a platform I enjoy, but in the case of youtube, they have been so deliberately detrimental to society in terms of platforming fascists that I feel bad about the prospect of paying them, even if much of the money is going to creators I do like who I’m actually watching

  • Salad@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Copying my comment over from fmhy instance -

    If you don’t mind paying ~2$ a month, you can get Family Premium using a VPN (I used India)

    Current working method from HUKD: (Private/Incognito browser is best)

    Create a new Google Account. Enter card details. Enter a fake billing address, any random address generator will do, as long as it’s from the correct region. Then select Try it Free. Navigate to YouTube, press YouTube Premium, and double-check that everything is in the right currency. Enter the same credit card and address information you used for creating the new Google Account. Click Buy 👍

    You can then add your main Google account as a family member.👍

    HUKD link

    • Digitoll@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe any accounts joining the family need to first have a Google Payments profile in the country the owner of the plan is in before you can join. Or is that not the case anymore?

      • Salad@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The above worked for me a few months ago - I’ve got family members using my family plan with no payments setup