• DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    In Sweden you are allowed to make copies for private useage. I can record and save whatever piece of media I want, as long as I don’t distribute it to other people and the material itself is not illegal (abuse material for example).

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    And here we see copyrighta blightus, the copyblight firm to the rest of us, looking to expand it’s territory.

    This species is, of course, an invader to the quiet widely watched waves; an invasive element that can, and will, upset the local ecosystem.

    If you listen closely, you can hear the call of these parasites; it sounds a little like “you wouldn’t steal a car”.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      Well, that particular federation can’t be mad at yt-dlp right now, because PornHub support is broken right now. It appears. I’ve been told.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Allow to explain why piracy can’t die in a way buisness majors can understand.

    She’s gorgeous. She’s fantastic in bed. She pegs you and won’t tell anybody. You want to marry her.

    You will be subjected to nonstop crazy bullshit for the rest of your life. She’s no longer fun, just expensive. She’s abusive. Nobody is happy.

    And now she has ads.

    You drink more. You stop coming home after work until she’s asleep. You refer to local hookers by their legal first names.

    One day she throws a clot and dies. And you feel relief. The abuse, the lies, the manipulation, the pretending to be happy is finally done. You are free.

    This in an anolgy for streaming services.

  • smileyhead@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Company happly sends media to my computer when requested.

    Company angry my computer do what I want with the media it got.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      All of it is strings of ones and zeros that are instructions that tell my computer what to display.

      Its basic freedom of speech. Imagine not beign able to give instructions in other contexts because you didn’t pay to use the words.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They describe the tool as an application that retrieves content by parsing web page data and interacting with platform playback endpoints, with GitHub serving as the primary delivery method for its source code, pre-compiled binaries, and installation instructions.

    Omg, web browsers will be next!

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    IIRC Google researchers have publicly used it for machine learning experiments. For example, for grabbing a sample video as part of some demo code.

  • Leon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s an EU piracy watchlist? Did anyone submit Facebook to it?

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      …Hmmmm… It should. If you read the linked article it claims the group lists X, discord, telegram and vimeo as sites that encourage infringement, so there’s that.

  • Vince@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Can it download any of those paid movies? That might be the only thing that makes sense

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s not piracy anyway even if that worked as the owner isn’t being deprived of what they own.

            • db2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Piracy is an act of robbery on the high seas.

              Robbery is larceny from the person or presence of another by violence or threat.

              Larceny is the unlawful taking of personal property with intent to deprive the rightful owner of it permanently.

              • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                In this context, we are referring to the “Copyright or patent infringement” definition, which is not theft.

    • bonn2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I would expect it can as long as you can provide a cookie for a login that owns the movie. But you know what can also do that? Firefox with OBS running, it just takes the full runtime to download.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I mean technically speaking unless you have permission of the copyright owner to download their video any tool you use to download (almost) any YouTube video would be a piracy tool.

      • subignition@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Your web browser necessarily has to download a YouTube video in order to display it to you. It just doesn’t provide an easy way for that data to be more than ephemeral.

        • evidences@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Going to YouTube and having your browser download the video so you can watch it would be an approved way to download the video, making further copies of it more than likely not.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            YT-DLP doesn’t make further copies. It downloads a video file from YouTube the exact same way your browser does.

            • evidences@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Ok that’s fun I was unaware of this term. It’s kind of interesting though to apply the term to something like digital streaming media that’s already, for lack of a better term, pre time-shifted.

              • GMac@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Interesting idea. If i subscribe to a streaming service for one month, i can save 31 days * 24 hours of content for later viewing. That would keep ke going quite a while since i only have the time to watch tv for a couple of hours per night…

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes, but no one likes to think that. Read other comments, people seemingly think downloading or distributing copyrights-protected material (just like movies) is perfectly legal. There really isn’t many videos on YouTube that uses public domain or creative commons.