• assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Plants react to stimulus as well. The smell of freshly cut grass for instance is chemical signaling – typically they’d be losing their plant matter to insects eating them, so they release chemicals to attract other insects which prey on the ones eating them.

    Is the grass in agony? It responds to harm with a chemical response aimed at stopping the harm.

    Where do we draw the line? Do we starve obligate carnivores so their prey lives?

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think you’re getting a little too philosophical. Why not start with mammals with whom we share much in common? They exhibit levels of cognition far above what people like to believe. They mourn, have cultures, traditions. They feel fear, and that fear looks like ours, so it should be something we all can understand.

      I’d also extend the same protection to fish and other complex organisms.

      If it was really up to me, nothing would ever suffer, whether an earth worm or a human. But realistically we can stop eating the things with brains and friends and that’d be a boon for our climate, environment, and our health.

      I would never starve animals in nature. My dog eats meat too because that’s what he is made to do. I don’t, because I don’t have to. Nature is cruel, but we don’t control that. We can easily control our nature and what we eat (or factory farm).