• FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That seems to put the carbon produced on the buyer of a product, not the company that produced the item. It mentions electricity as one and its not like you choose how your electricity is generated. Others being land use and food production which again you can’t control because large corporations do that, not individuals.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there were no buyers, there would be no producers. It is always on buyers.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet it’s easy to stop the production while it’s nearly impossible to stop the consumption.

          • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s nearly impossible to remove people buying something while it’s very easy to stop a company from producing something.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol what? Do you even understand that a company only produces something because people are buying that thing?

              • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Tobacco companies are selling and advertising vapes for children. Do you think children should just stop smoking or should they not be allowed to do that?