2016 - Lebron and Kyrie were must watch tv. Also Kobe drops 60 in his last game. 2001 - AI was incredible 1993 - Every Knicks game felt like a finals game. Almost dethroned MJ 2011 - Dirk

The best part is that all the big Rondo fans gave him a total pass on doing one of the most disrespectful things you could ever do to another person. But he’s good at Connect 4 tho…

From a shooting standpoint only, it’s absolutely a guarantee. Randle has been one of the worst shooting big man all-stars that I can ever remember. We’re talking an almost 60 game sample size. Yes, KP is unproven but he’s a true shooter and could never build that many houses.

Randle probably has more value and has been a 2x all-nba player for a Knicks team that made the playoffs in both those seasons. BUT, in the playoffs Randlehas been horrific. Think he’s like a 34% shooter in those 3 series. That’s like Ricky Rubio lol.

KP is so unreliable bc of injuries. But even if he only shot 3s, he’d shoot better than Randle has

No, that is one important fact out of several you chose to use. My explanation is the history of their time together and KD in OKC. That is the prime that is only disputable if you are looking to argue.

Because Curry is far and away your fav player and nothing will ever change that. Doesn’t matter that the head coach, Steve Kerr, said multiple times who is the best player. Doesn’t matter how many FMVPs Curry won with KD. Or how he received 0 votes in 2015 when they won it all lol. None of these things matter to you. Nor does Kyrie outplaying him in the biggest choke job in NBA history. Or how his team didn’t even make the playoffs and guys like you thought he deserved MVP.

Ok. I agree with that. He gets credit for the effort

No, he was not inefficient. He shot the same FG%percentage as players like Kobe, Melo, Pierce, and others. TS% changes everything when the 3 ball is part of the game. But yes, he took bad shots

Not sure what this sample size is from. But Curry was never better that KD and I explained why. Sure the best shooter ever sure has had many amazing moments. But there’s also a thing called defense

Well, you can’t compare him to other offensive stiffs like Rodman and Wallace bc the $ today is so different

Yes, bc he shot from 3pt range and beyond, which was a bad %age shot back then. Also league avg during the center era is not going to favor guys like him. TS% makes a lot more sense in the 3pt era

The Playoff MVP award is not that intriguing. Nobody ever remembers the MLB championship series MVPs. Sure, they’re nice

Pistol played in the no 3pt era so it’s not really fair to compare his TS% to guys from the 3 era. He was far and away a better shooter than anyone on this list.

Of course you can. KD in his prime was clearly better than Curry in a 7 game series. Height matters in a sport with 10 foot rims. Game on the line, you want the 6’2 Curry running off screens and most likely taking a tough 25+ footer, or do you want to give it to arguably the best midrange shooter of all time who can shoot over anyone? Seems like a no-brainer