This is the right attitude. Just because the fucker decides not to act like he works anymore, doesn’t mean he deserves our money. There is absolutely no way I would ever consider buying a Tesla. Even IF they somehow force him to sell every single stock he owns, and he has absolutely nothing to do with the company, the rest of theses investors are just as bad as him, for sticking with him over the last 10 years. They can all get fucked.

Yea, just an unbelievable asshole.

I’m talking about this case with the medical student.

Except the players with the biggest headstart get to make up the rules of the game.

What’s her motivation in this?

Did she realise how incredibly corrupt this is and wanted to call it out?

Did she want to shout out how fantastic the system is, that just by voting for the right candidate she earned a million?

Is she just stupid, and thought this was a brag?

What in the world could make this person admit to selling their vote to a fascist?

I’ve never used those apps myself, but I think a factor is, how do you meet other people when you start working most of the day? Most of my friends who use dating apps, do so because meeting someone at the job is unrealistic, and in some fields, super dumb. So instead they’d have to hope to meet someone at an event or something, but after working a full week, they don’t want to go to events all over the city in the hope that they meet someone, especially not when datings apps are so readily available and easy to use.

I’m not sure when the shift happened, but I had many friends using dating apps mid 2010’s when they started working after highschool, for lack of a better option.

And how do you determine who raped who if it’s a question about how drunk you were? I have had a lot of nights out in my teens (european), where I have no clue what happened after midnight, but didn’t get home until 05:00. If I had sex with someone pretty much equally as drunk, who did the raping?

Yes?

The prick is a fucking nazi, and needs to face the 1945 consequenses of being the nazi minister of propaganda. He doesn’t just get to pull back a bit and sit in his cosy Tesla office, acting like he isn’t the most deplorable waste of oxygen the world has ever seen.

My computer is always in the mood for whatever activity I wanna do. My wife is usually too busy with her computer.

My biggest issue with survival games is usually the lack of a goal. If Jagex treats this game the same way as OSRS or RS3 concerning quests, this could very well be a really nice experience. It could also very well be a very generic survival clone that adds absolutely nothing new to the genre.

It’s also not the first time Jagex has fucked up games. It often seems like they have absolutely no idea what makes OSRS and RS3 as good as they are, and at least for OSRS, the dedication of the mods seem to be the only reason the game isn’t dead.

I suppose we’ll have to wait and see which direction they take it. I hope it’ll be good, but I absolutely expect them to shit the bed on this.

You can do whatever the fuck you want, as long as you have an expensive enough lawyer who will “correct” you, when people point out what you’re doing is illegal.

It’s by design though. None of this is because of loopholes. What is happening is because the people in power wanted it to be possible.

I mean, I hope I’m wrong, but my point is that without more information, I would have to see some actual data to compare this stuff. I am however aware that we won’t get reliable data until large-scale production is both possible, and profitable.

It’s the same scepticism I have when a new building material says it’s much better for the environment, but then it turns out it’s either not possible to upscale to the point that it’s actually environmentally friendly, because it uses a very limited by-product from a different production. Or it turns out they don’t count the materials needed for the underlying construction to make it possible to use, because it’s not directly part of the material.

I just want some proper articles about this stuff, with actual numbers and calculations made public, instead of a picture shared on some social media.

My thought process is that if you have to mimic a living environment, you still need to include most of what the natural environment needs. The one artificial meat I’ve read about had the meat growing in vats of some “solution” that mimics the natural environment of the meat (so like a body). Granted, the process in the post may not function like this, but if it does, that process would include:

• Heating, because the meat is actually meat, and the cells require heat to function, which still isn’t all that efficient.
• Getting rid of the artificial meat’s dead cells and natural waste.
• The “solution” itself I imagine is a funny chemical mix of some sort. So getting those chemicals extracted from their sources. (This one is a bit more iffy, I have no idea what the “solution” is, could be demineralised water with beef stock mixed in for all I know).
• I can’t imagine keeping the “solution” as clean as needed for food safety laws around the world is an easy feat coupled with the other points I’ve listed.

These are all just speculations, please feel free to prove me wrong on any of them, and be sceptical of my list. But this is what I’m sceptical about with the very lacking information in the post.

I didn’t find an answer in my very limited search for what is actually used to grow the meat, so depending on what makes up the “stuff” that brings nutrients into the growing part, we may still need a lot of farmers for something like this. There’s also no way the growing environment, which seeks to create an artificial “animal”, is energyefficient.

I’ll celebrate the day we don’t need farmers, and I’ll celebrate the day it’ll be at least environmentally equivolent, but until I see evidence of those things, I’ll be very sceptical of this stuff.

What a god damn coward.

Sure they’re increasing their defense spending. But not really in the interest of USA.

USA wanted european defense spending to increase for multiple reasons:

1. To funnel european money into the american military industrial complex.

• This isn’t happening right now. Europeans are prioriticing european contractors.

2. To fight in american wars of agression around the world.

• Fat fucking chance when USA is threatening wars of agression against NATO countries.

3. To defend against Russia.

• With Putin owning Trump, this is now against Trump’s interests.
• While the threat from Russia is pretty big, they’re not in any way in a position to fight anything bigger than Ukraine.

Denmark is currently investing heavily in seamines, ships to handle the seamines and underwater surveillance. Unfortunately I fear it’s too little too late, but only time will tell I suppose.

No matter what, the best bet is to make the invasion so costly it won’t be worth it for the US.

Then how the fuck else am I supposed to feel superior?

Sounds like a pretty good idea though to have airbags and crumblezones in something that supposedly can drive 162 km/h (101 mph), and accelerate from 0-60 mph in 6 seconds. You couldn’t pay me to drive something as unsafe as this thing.