

They’re just unintentionally funny. I also block most, but instead keep this one and a few others tagged for amusement.
Edit: also for watching their cumulative vote score build over time. They’re at -20 as of today.


They’re just unintentionally funny. I also block most, but instead keep this one and a few others tagged for amusement.
Edit: also for watching their cumulative vote score build over time. They’re at -20 as of today.


What you’re doing here is literally the definition of a straw man argument.


I was starting to forget why I have you tagged “Insufferable Pedant” in Voyager. Thanks for the refresher.


I found her plastic surgeon.

Oof. Way to embody your slur of choice.


That makes sense. I’m not an American but lived in the country for a number of years, so I understand some but not much of the culture.


I now understand and agree completely!


Let me show you an example. Let’s use easy ratios for easy numbers, so let’s say people vote Democrat to Republican 3:2.
If you have 100 people vote, you’ll end up with 60 democratic votes, 40 Republican.
If you have 200 people vote, you’ll have 120 Democrat votes, 80 Republican.
Increasing the number of total voters in this scenario will never change the outcome. 400 people? 240 to 160.
The only way getting more votes by mail will help Democrats win an election is if the ratio of Democrat to Republican voters is higher in mail-in voters compared to other population groups.
Or are you suggesting Democrats are less reliable voters, so getting them to vote increases the relative percentage of Democrat voters?


This explanation doesn’t make sense mathematically, though. If the ratio of Democrat to Republican voters is fairly consistent amongst groups, increasing the number of people in any given group that votes will result in that same ratio, just with greater numbers. Saying otherwise is like saying you can add 2% milk to 2% milk to eventually get back to whole milk
The only way voting by mail helps Democrats is if the vote by mail crowd has a heavier democratic skew.


Vaguely understanding it made me feel not quite so old, and I’m firmly middle-aged.


Why yes, it’s undoubtedly equally moronic.


Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.
Absolute fucking numpty here.


You sound like my father, until he died from complications of COPD from smoking.


Mate, I may or may not be qualified to diagnose anyone and don’t know this person intimately, but they’re giving off serious cluster B vibes. You can’t argue logic with a cluster B personality that doesn’t want to hear it. There’s the world we live in and there’s the world they fabricate, and the harder you push them toward reality, the deeper they delve into their denial of it.


deleted by creator


How long have you worked at the red flag factory? Do they know how many you’re taking home?
My thought process in response: only 2005? That means she couldn’t be older than… Oh. Oh no.


Eh? Are we reading the same things? I can’t see why you think the comment called directly out as a response is the initial comment, which is also called out directly in the article.
Haha, okay. DARVO much?