Because algorithm will show highly controversial nonsense due to it being highly engaged with.
Some people’s posts need to be filtered through an automod because they are that ridiculous. Also some people try to hide ragebait in longer posts.
But this thread seems to have been prematurely deleted for the most common reason, the mods hate the Grizzlies, and only like posts punching down at them.
Cause they live in a world of perpetual hyperbole. They never learned to properly voice an opinion without the nonsense attached.
But clicks :(
Ok name the 100% agreed upon top ten so we can pull away accolades and keep this entire thing in order.
Oh there isn’t one?
Thanks for coming to my TedTalk.
No because making up “what if this person had these accolades or didn’t” is a dumb waste of time since we have a hard enough time agreeing on what they DID do.
You take a non-scientific subjective process and add MORE subjectivity to it. How is this fun for you guys? The answer is whatever you want it to be based on what you’re changing their stats too. Want them to be seen more favorably? Make up accolades, less favorably, what if they didn’t do the things we watched them do?
Maybe get a hobby instead….
10 years? Lmao
His legacy is cemented. He’s gonna forever be punching bag. His ring will be as lauded and respected as KDs. Anytime he mentions it folks will laugh a little bit to themselves before thinking: “Yep that’s good Jordan, you did help Steph get another one! Good job!”
This type of attitude might be why no one stood behind him.
Facts bro.
You start to realize theres huge leash for the guys with tenure and a lot of shit gets looked over and it can kill your drive when you don’t get the benefit as the next man up when they aren’t even performing.