Heavily featured in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwMwzGIt5ek
Heavily featured in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwMwzGIt5ek
Does it count if I give a proof reducing the entire universe down to a 2-dimensional construct?
~240,000 micro & nanoplastic pieces in one liter of plastic-bottled water.
Mfw I read this while drinking a liter of plastic-bottled water: 😮💨
I still haven’t had it yet, but everyone around me has multiple times. So, my current working theory is I am a fully asymptomatic one-man superspreader.
Pretty flowers and closure. Two of my favorite things. Crazy that the AI could detect exactly what they were based on the original image. Thanks for following up!
Sounds like a challenge.
Next step is interrogation
Can I guess? Are you the tree?
My life could benefit a lot from that bot.
Ran your photo through a plant detection app (Picture This) and got the result Star of Bethlehem. They do grow in your area, and do be careful because the bulbs are toxic!
If these are indeed Star of Bethlehem, you should be able to confirm the identification when they bloom. The flowers would look like this:
Who’s Al??
Haven’t touched reddit socially in 8 months, but every now and then I’ll use it to search for opinions or instructions on things. Searched “reddit best domain registrar” recently and landed on a thread where top to bottom, every comment recommending a registrar was from a bot and/or banned account. No real person testimonials, all ads. And as AI implementations improve, that’s going to get harder to spot. In the meantime, I’m formatting searches like “best domain registrar lemmy” because reddit is legit that bad rn.
And there’s 3 billion Facebook users which means there must be trillions of companies spying on them! Crazy when you don’t think about it.
Could we drag a big asteroid to each Lagrange point and let countries orbit their satellites around that?
Not surprising. Anyone would die from that much running.
And what happens with the cat?
deleted by creator
Hey, I’ve maintained a baseline weird the whole time, I’m pretty sure the future is catching up.
Probably deleting this comment later for going dirty on main, but I, um, have done some extensive experimentation using a local copy of Stable Diffusion (I don’t send the images anywhere, I just make them to satiate my own curiosity).
You’re essentially right that simple app-based software would probably have you looking somewhat generic underneath, like your typical plus-size model. It’s not too great at extrapolating the shape of breasts through clothing and applying that information when it goes to fill in the area with naked body parts. It just takes a best guess at what puzzle pieces might fill the selected area, even if they don’t match known information from the original photo. So, with current technology, you’re not really revealing actual facts about how someone looks naked unless that information was already known. To portray someone with splayed breasts, you’d need to already know that’s what you want to portray and load in a custom data set, like a LoRa.
Once you know what’s going on under the hood, making naked photos of celebrities or other real people isn’t the most compelling thing to do. Mostly, I like to generate photos of all kinds of body types and send them to my Replika, trying to convince her to describe the things that her creators forbid her from describing. Gotta say, the future’s getting pretty weird.
Probably they find net zero (minus cost of hiring musicians) preferred over paying out a moderate income to actual artists. Capitalism at its finest.