• thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.caEnglish
      78·
      1 year ago

      The relationship is “you can ride a motorcycle (or tricycle in this case) and also be disabled, thereby being eligible to park there.”

      • PapaStevesy@midwest.socialEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        It’s a motor vehicles parked where one is not allowed to be parked, what does disability have to do with any of this?

        • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.caEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          I think what you’re getting at is “disabled or not, parking on the painted margin is prohibited,” which is correct as far as I know, but I think most people would think about it differently if the driver was disabled.

          e.g. Someone with difficulty walking wanted to exercise their permission to park there so that they could be closer to the entrance, but still wanted to leave a wide spot open so another disabled driver could potentially use it. Still wrong, but many people would perceive that differently.

          Again, not defending the behavior (and the driver likely wasn’t disabled, just a jerk)… But surely you see how their disability status is relevant in a scenario concerning a disabled parking spot?

          • PapaStevesy@midwest.socialEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            No, it’s not relevant at all. It’s not a parking spot, handicap or otherwise. You just can’t park there, no one can.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.todayEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              “Der, there are three spaces. How dare he park in such a way that 4 vehicles can fit in them?!?” – you, probably.

            • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.caEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              I think you’re using the word “relevant” in an overly restrictive way. It can be relevant but still not justify the park job.