• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    62
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, the proper way to put it should probably be to not insert judicial outcomes into politicking, not politics.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are 34 convictions in New York State that are waiting on sentencing. That sentencing can - and very arguably should - include incarceration.

      Lock him up.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      He’s literally a felon. He’s facing three more court cases about serious criminal acts directly related to politics and his time in the office he’s seeking. That’s all directly relevant to the political campaign.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        He’s literally a felon who has been convicted of campaign finance fraud. But oh no, don’t mention that since he’s in the midst of another campaign. That would be too political.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re saying that if someone is convicted for election malfeasance and is running in another election, their opponent shouldn’t mention it? Really?