They’re allowed to say whatever they want. It doesn’t mean it happens and it isn’t proof. I can’t stand the dude anymore than anyone else- but I don’t buy into hearsay.
There’s enough shit about him that’s provenly true. We don’t need to muddy the waters with “he said, she said” bullshit.
While I wouldn’t put it past him, I don’t accept second-hand accusations as legit.
You would make a terrible juror.
Don’t courts not accept hearsay as evidence?
They accept sworn testimony.
Hearsay is ‘i heard he said that from someone else.’ from a witness not ‘i personally heard him say that’
It’s second-hand information.
Witnesses are allowed to say what they saw and heard. this is…like…one of the most basic things dude. WITNESS.
Did you think witnesses are only allowed to talk about what they SAW? That audio was banned?
They’re allowed to say whatever they want. It doesn’t mean it happens and it isn’t proof. I can’t stand the dude anymore than anyone else- but I don’t buy into hearsay.
There’s enough shit about him that’s provenly true. We don’t need to muddy the waters with “he said, she said” bullshit.
I thought I explained what hearsay is to you as simply as I could.
So… I can say whatever I want about you, as long as I do it in a courtroom? No poof is needed- just. …
I said so.
Witness testimony is literally proof.
How do you think any witness testimony was handled before the advent of cameras and tape recorders?
This giant Mussolini-stan never would have held a 1930s fascist eugenics belief.