• orangeboats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Subways are pretty much exclusively built in the cities, and the US doesn’t lack cities. The same is true for most countries.

    • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Subways are pretty much exclusively built in the cities

      Not just any city. Dense cities. Cities that are so densely populated that it would be /impossible/ for every person to move around in a car. Countless US cities are not even close to crossing that threshold. It just makes no sense to look at nationwide per capita on this. Only a city by city comparison of like with like population density is sensible.

      (edit)
      There is a baby elephant in the room that needs mention: US cities are designed with shitty zoning plans. They are designed so that each person on avg needs to travel more distance per commute to accomplish the same tasks (work and groceries). This heightens the congestion per capita. So ideally we would calculate daily net commute distance needed per capita plotted against subway track per capita for cities of comparable people per m². Which would embarrass US city mayors even more.

      • Dinsmore@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        At a time when we also need more housing density, I feel like subways go hand-in-hand. And even for shittily zoned cities with huge suburb-like areas, I feel like most would benefit from at least nearby subways with parking lots (or ideally, additional bike paths).

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        except the US also has some of the largest cities in the world lol, NYC alone should be churning out new subways like crazy