My partner and I have just binged TOS-Enterprise last year and we are starting Discovery today. I was just wondering if we can also start LD or will there still be jokes from Discovery (and the later shows) that we might miss out on? I have really bad FOMO anxiety and am worried there will be references in LD that we will miss because we havent watched any of the new shows yet.

  • williams_482@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are relatively few direct references to Discovery in Lower Decks. More importantly, you’ll enjoy Lower Decks even if you don’t notice or “get” a handful of references.

    Lower Decks isn’t good because it references older shows, it’s good because it’s funny and you care about the characters. There are people out there watching it and loving it with minimal or no prior Trek knowledge.

  • Arrakis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    SNW has a Lower Decks crossover episode, which is hilarious. Imo, SNW is essentially the only good characters taken from Discovery (which is fucking awful) and put in a far superior Trek. It’s got the same “doesn’t take itself too seriously while still addressing serious things” as some of the light-hearted Voyager/DS9 episodes.

    • StarServal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s because SNW is traditional episodic Star Trek whereas Discovery and Picard are serialized series. Serialized series need to constantly escalate the tension and threats so you tend to get super serious action drama. Meanwhile, episodic series can get away with doing stuff like “how would the crew react to the entire ship turning pink?”

      They both have their place in television, but Star Trek better lends itself to episodic format where you can have breaks to reset the tension.

      • Arrakis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey just so you know, the word you’re after is “series”, it’s plural. “Series’s” means either something belonging to the series, or “series is”. :)

      • Jason - VE3MAL@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a really good take. I have enjoyed the serialized shows -but they are a juggernaut of emotion and intensity to watch. You tend to watch them once, and it’s a fairly wild ride, but then it’s done. I suspect that I will be re-watching episodes of SNW and lower decks for years to come, as I have for TOS and TNG. That’s how Trek wormed it’s way into my brain in the first place.

    • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Umm, it could be mentioned, could it not?

      From their point of view, deleted because I fail at spoiler tags

        • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I intended to get at. They could mention it, but wouldn’t know any special reason they should. And since Boims loves talking about the special ones, but wouldn’t know anything about Discovery. The way the other comment was worded I thought they were just secret in general, which I definitely don’t remember anything like that. I just got confused. I should watch them all close together at some point. Watching in real time week to week with other stuff going on (around season 4 time ahem) make me forget details.

          I don’t remember anything about the propulsion being classified. It didn’t come with that, did it? I thought they got that one thing later, after the show was in progress. Was there something special about it when it was built?

    • KirbyProton@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably get down voted for this but I’m new to Star Trek online discussion so be kind :) - people didn’t like Discovery?

      Sure it took a bit to find its feet but I thought the last series was excellent!

      But then I loved Picard by the end of series 3 too so many I’m alone here.

      Either way, loving all the Star Trek shows coming out these days, was nothing for so long and now…

      • Venicon@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think having multiple galaxy spanning events all spun around one particular character is the trouble for me. Didn’t mind Burnham but…spoilers ahead.

        Turns out she is related to spock. Oh and started the Klingon war. Oh and finished it. Oh and also she was the only one who stopped the apocalypse cos it was actually her mum who was a time traveller. Oh and she disobeyed all the orders but got to be captain. Oh and then something about another galaxy spanning event. I stopped watching not long after. Also part of the beauty of Trek for me has been the ensemble cast full of interesting characters. I honestly can’t remember any of the bridge crew apart from Burnham, Saru and Tilly.

        LD and SNW and Picard S3 are outstanding in my opinion.

      • Jason - VE3MAL@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Star Trek discussion /usually/ tends toward anything new being bad, and always has. SNW and lower decks are exceptions because they do so much fan service and return to a more classic Trek format. Discovery was groundbreaking in a way that I’m sure Roddenberry would have enjoyed, but groundbreaking also implies jarring change and throwing away things that work for experiments that sometimes don’t.

      • Slim Bill (He/Him)@noc.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @KirbyProton @PlasmaDistortion I love them both.
        There are a few episodes of TOS and Enterprise that I don’t much care for, but overall I believe that Gene Rodenberry, Gene Coons, and Dorothy Fontana have done more to define our role in the universe and our responsibilities to each other than Karl Marx.

        • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me Discovery is enjoyable, but not as “Trek”. It is like a completely different show that lacks the charm of the other series. From a Lower Decks perspective, there are not too many references to it so it puts it at the bottom for someone wanting to understand LD better.

      • JWBananas@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Discovery were as unpopular as some people really think it is, then none of the current shows would be in production.

      • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re saying that the 90s shows have more direct references in Lower Decks than Discovery, I can agree.

        I’d add The Animated Series too though. There are many Easter eggs from TAS included.

        However, the OP should be aware that Lower Decks is written to be enjoyed by those completely new to the franchise. The deep cuts are added value not a necessity. There are numerous new fans that watched Lower Decks and only later got to the other shows they reference and enjoy discovering in reverse.

        Discovery in-universe becomes a secret at a level that it’s not the kind of thing the Cerritos crew would know about from reading historic resources.

      • 3enhjz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. There are always specific episodes i like to rewatch but Discovery had none that stood out for me.

  • saegiru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of things related to Discovery are supposed to be secret, so if they stick to canon, there shouldn’t be much mention of Discovery at all I think. As of now there hasn’t been much if anything related to Discovery discussed as far as I remember.

    • Slim Bill (He/Him)@noc.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      @saegiru @AirbrushThreepwood I enjoy Discovery - the story of Michael Burnham is fascinating and engaging, to me.
      Once the strike is settled I’ll upgrade my Paramount Plus subscription.
      And I’ll ask for an official “As Astra Per Aspera” poster featuring Una, too.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Discovery is not necessary, but there’s quite a bit of stuff from TNG, Voyager and DS9 in Lower Decks.

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I love LD and I mostly like SNW. Discovery lost me near the end of season 2 (and almost lost me several times before). As others have said, the good characters went to SNW (except for Saru).

    If you want an actually good show that has similar energy to what Disco was going for, while being majorly disloyal to it’s source material (also like Disco) watch Foundation.

  • surfrock66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think discovery seasons 1 and 2 were fine and help as a precursor to snw which is great, but for sure skip discovery seasons 3 and 4