• Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Do we know who is setting the price higher? Is it more like it’s 6% higher but so is everything else or more of the manufacturer selling to the storefronts at a higher cost thus forcing grocery stores to set the price higher by 6%?

    Because it informs who we should be mad at

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Shareholder primacy is upheld by the state putting every publicly owned company antagonistic to its workers and customers, id est, the public.

    This means the companies are forced to charge what the market will bear, and it’s the responsibility of the government to regulate prices to keep things affordable.

    But this means lobbying by companies is an attack on the public. (It’s highly profitable to bribe officials and should be illegal. It also means officials who take lobby money are traitors to the public, the nation and their office, whether or not doing so is legal.

    So the justification for bullets is there, and has been for several decades. We’re just not very good at seeing when we have nothing left to lose.

  • darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So I propose a solution:

    We start and fund a non-profit organization designed to produce basic living essentials and sell it at the cost to manufacture, regardless of market pressures. Then we all collectively buy from this non-profit and have a functional means of production legally owned and controlled by the people.

    Set up strict rules to ban anyone who has ever worked in any upper management position in any for-profit basic essentials producing company from ever holding any position of power in the non-profit. No one from the corporate world at all. No one from any position in state or federal government. No lobbyists or consultants or members of their think tanks or any of their goons.

    Use open source designs for the factories and everyone in the community works together to automate them as much as is possible.

    • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You’ll have to make the way the non profit organisation is run or organised, also impossible to gather autocracy in.

      Not just hard, impossible. No one should be able to mess with any aspects of the nonprofit, incorruptible, people-owned, affordable (NIPA) organisation.

      And even if it is hard and not impossible, it should be made such that it is easier to get back to that situation, than to remove any of the NIPA aspects.

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes this is what I’ve wanted to do for a long time, I think it’s basically inevitable that it’ll happen eventually but an actual effort to make it happen faster would be such a positive thing in the world.

      The reason I say it’s inevitable is because design tools are getting consistently better, hardware is cheaper than ever, and ever more useful stuff is being added to the commons. With ai assisted CAD and ai assisted manufacture we’re going to see so many amazing new open source designs getting built.

      People are going to start moving away from for-profit designed homegoods like washing machines and printers because they’ll be able to get a community designed and tested product modified to their specific needs and tastes then have that fabricated at whatever local firm or tinkerer you want to give your business to.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My ex-favorite tea brands silently cutting 20% of tea bags in the box and raised the price 15%, while keeping the same sized box and make the printed weight and contents smaller and harder to find.

    And people call me crazy for getting frustrated.