On the Food network they boil potatoes, but they poach carrots. They poach turkey, but they boil eggs. They sauté’ onions, but they fry eggs in the same pan. Likewise, they fry hash browns, but they sauté’ onions in the same pan before adding the potatoes.

I can go on for days.

    • Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      All good but I’d just like to point something out.

      When you boil pasta you’re actually hydrating it, and it’s a process that occurs above 80C, you don’t need water to be boiling savagely.

      In fact, it’s preferable to let pasta simmer, as full boiling is a bit too “violent” and tends to damage most kinds of pasta.

      You know, when some pieces are broken and torn like when it’s overcooked? You can avoid that by keeping the temperature low.

      Some people in Italy even turn the fire off after the water has started boiling ,as the water is hot enough to cook the pasta and keep it nice and firm.

      • evilgiraffe666@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting, I was taught you used a rolling boil for pasta so it wouldn’t stick together. Maybe there’s a halfway where it rolls for a few minutes then gets turned down as the pieces soften and become vulnerable to tearing.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re correct but it begs the question, why the hell would they poach carrots? If any vegetable can stand up to boiling it’s a carrot. Blanching I could see, (that’s a 2 minute dunk in boiling water, OP, with a quick cooldown) if you wanted to pre-cook them so they wouldn’t be harder than everything else. Maybe they were just being poncy.

        • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firstly, I appreciate you breaking it down! I knew they were different terms, but never really knew them outside of the standard ‘poached eggs’.

          Secondly, soggy carrots can get bent. If it doesn’t crunch it’s not for me.

            • poppy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You might be mildly allergic? Bananas as soon as they hit my stomach make me feel like I’m going to throw up.

          • canthidium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can’t stand soggy carrots. I can eat them in soup, but it’s not my favorite. I much prefer roasted or stir fried. Actually most veggies, I prefer that way.

      • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Poaching in olive oil, butter, wine, etc would give a different flavor. I agree that water poached carrots would be just a slower way to cook carrots than boiling them.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Poaching in oil or butter sounds like a long way to saute them, especially when it takes sooooo long that you take your eyes off for a minute and they start browning.

          • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you keep your oil at the right temp (below boiling) the thing you’re cooking won’t ever brown. You get it cooked through evenly and infused with flavor from the poaching liquid. The texture and flavor will be much more like a boiled veggie than a sauted one. And usually if you’re poaching veggies you leave them in much larger chunks than you would saute - like even a whole carrot wouldn’t be weird.

            • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Okay but I’m thinking it would take a long time and on my stove it would get hotter than that even on the lowest setting, which was what I was getting at. (I assume you meant below the boiling temperature of water, not oil. And probably below a simmer.)

              • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yep, 80C or 180F. I’m not sure if you can actually boil oil on a stove, but I do know that would be a bad idea. If you ever end up wanting to poach you might be able to do it in your oven on a very low setting rather than the stovetop.

                • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, no boiling oil! Unless you need to defend the castle.

                  In fact, I don’t think oil by itself can boil, it just smokes and then bursts into flame. The boiling effect when deep-frying is from water in the food becoming steam.

    • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks like we were typing at the same time. I totally agree with everything here.

  • boothin@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, there are differences between those things.

    Poaching is cooking in hot liquid, but the liquid is not boiling or even simmering, so it is a lower temp than both.

    Saute generally means you’re using a small amount of oil/fat and stirring/tossing the food to spread the oil/fat around on everything while cooking everything. Pan frying generally means you’re cooking a larger piece of something and not tossing it around.

  • CherryRedDragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    As pointed out already, these terms have quite specific and different meanings but it’s worth being aware that they often get used interchangeably a lot too, and therefore possibly incorrectly. A lot of the specific terms will come from french cuisine (like saute) including all different names for exactly how you’ve sliced up your vegetables (julliene, brunoise etc). I believe this was so recipes could be written very precisely and therefore reproduced more acccurately.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It usually has to do with what chemical process happens to the food in question. Not all foods react the same to being dunked in boiling water. (Although I couldn’t tell you what the difference between potatoes in boiling water and carrots in boiling water.) In the case of onions vs eggs, the same process is 1) extracting the water and using it to make sauce, with the onions, or 2) boiling off a tiny amount of liquid and heating the proteins to solidify them, in the case of eggs. Same method, wildly different chemistry.

    Sometimes it has to do with how long that cooking method is applied, since a different thing happens. For example, you can poach OR hard-boil an egg; same method, different amount of cooking time.

    In short, with a few exceptions, it’s not about what process you’re applying to cook the food, but about the result that it achieves in the food item.

    • mypasswordistaco@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Poached and hard boiled eggs vary by more than just their cook time. These names are much less about chemical processes and more about differences in technique. See other comments in this thread.

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I hand you an egg and tell you it’s a poached egg, you’re going to thinking about the consistency of the egg, not how I cooked it. Poached means the result, not the process.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you hand me a poached egg, I’m not going to take it because I can see it has no shell and it’s going to be all over me staining me with the runny yolk. Now if you gave me an egg with a shell and told me it was a soft-boiled egg, I would think about the consistency.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean… you get the result by doing the process. You can get different consistencies based on how long you cook them for.

          They’re different techniques with different results. You can’t give me a boiled egg and say it was poached and have me not be able to tell. Nor vice-versa. You can have runny boiled eggs, you can have soft-boiled eggs, you can have hard-boiled eggs, but you can’t make a boiled egg look like a poached egg.

          • xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is a thread about why they use certain words, though. It isn’t a thread about how to cook an egg. They use the word “poached” to mean a certain consistency. To poach an egg means to produce an egg with that consistency. In fact, as far as the recipe is concerned, it doesn’t matter whether you heated up any water at all: if the instruction is “poach an egg” and you inject a Maxwell’s demon to heat up the individual molecules of the egg the appropriate amount, the result is a poached egg and that’s still what you call it.

            They use words to mean what the result is.

            More to the point, the reason they use language this way is that many results in cooking can be achieved through multiple different processes. Chefs come up with different solutions to the same problem. Talking about how the solutions work is interesting, but it gets in the way if you’re talking about a basic step in the middle of a recipe. If you know multiple ways to get to that result, and you don’t want to prescribe any particular one, you use a word like “poach” or “fry” and assume that the cook following your recipe already knows at least one way to get there.

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok, you didn’t read a word I said, that’s cool. Poached egg is a consistency, whatever you say.

                • nyctre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t reply to the thread, I replied to you. You said the difference between boiled and poached egg is the consistency, which is not true. The difference between poached and boiled is the process. If you poach an egg for 1 minute vs 5 minutes, you’ll get wildly different consistencies. They’ll both still be poached eggs, however

  • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Poach equals lower temp liquid. It can be oil or water type liquid. Boil is maximum temp water type liquid only. Blanching is boiling for a short time with the intention of not cooking all of the way through (eg to get skin off or to prepare for preservation by freezing).

    Fry and saute are used interchangably all the time. One person’s fried onions is another’s sauted onions. Saute should indicate small pieces turned or tossed in a moderate amout of fat. Fry can be small or large pieces and can have moderate to lots of fat as a cooking medium.

    Note that this is how normal people in my region and life use these terms and I make no claim that this is ‘right’ just my experience.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re slight variations in technique. Poaching is usually at a lower temperature than boiling, for instance.

  • eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boiling happens in boiling liquid, poaching happens at a lower temperature and you wouldnt boil turkey. Sauteing is frying but uses little fat, unlike deep frying for example.

  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have no answers, just pointing out that boiled carrots and poached eggs are also things.

    Boiling, poaching and blanching all have to do with how long something is immersed in boiling water, for instance. (I think, and those definitions may also subtly change with the food item.)