Sarah Katz, 21, had a heart condition and was not aware of the drink’s caffeine content, which exceeded that of cans of Red Bull and Monster energy drinks combined, according to a legal filing

  • Orionza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    246
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope this lawsuit forces them to remove this. I’m sorry this young girl died. This isn’t the first issue they had with this drink. My husband and I were discussing it months ago. He thought it was just lemonade - sugar, water, lemons. We didn’t figure out why he was up all night. Later someone old him how much caffeine it has. We had no idea. It’s dangerous to those with high bp.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      120
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not going to lie when I first read the headline I thought this was probably a frivolous lawsuit but after reading the article I thought that stuff should get pulled.

      • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        133
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like that McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit. Poor lady was made a mockery of for ordering hot coffee because it sounds ridiculous at first but she had 2nd degree burns. It was recklessly hot, as was this drink recklessly produced and marketed.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          113
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          3rd degree groin burns that required grafts.

          She initially asked for just 20k to cover her medical bills, and they instead offered like $800.

          Also of note, that huge 2.7mil fine the jury found? Just the profits from 2 days of McDonald’s coffee sales. The judge reduced it to $650k, but even that likely wasent paid as they settled out of court at that point.

          • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            59
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was also discovered that McDonald’s was aware of the danger of serving their coffee that hot, yet they continued to do so because it meant they had to give fewer free refills. If you have to wait 20 minutes for your coffee to cool down before you drink it, you’re going to get less refills overall

            • Misconduct@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              The worst part of that is knowing they probably determined it’s cheaper to settle injuries than keep it at the temps they were supposed to. I know corporations are soulless money making machines but that always feels extra dark to think about

            • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              IIRC their explanation was for take away, keeping the coffee hotter so it would last until you got home.

            • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought the specific wording in their documentation was because they wanted the smell of the coffee to fill the restaurant. Did McDonald’s give refills of coffee?

        • DreamButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Funny you should mention that. I use to work for the franchise owner who’s brother-in-law (who also worked for the franchise) gave that woman the cup of coffee (or so he would say) when they were franchising with McDonalds. And guess where I was working at the time? Panera

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It also explains why the coffee is so bad. Heating coffee above a certain temp is just burning it.

          • Fester@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            It should be brewed at 195-205 F, just a bit higher than McDonalds served it.

            But normally it would quickly cool down after it’s brewed. Any burning from reaching that temp is from a hot plate exceeding the temp and burning the bits of oil and soot that are in contact with the plate. Water, and I assume coffee, can’t be heated above boiling at 212 F anyway, but the hot plate and carafe or urn parts can, and steam can, and oil can.

            Anyway I’m just saying it would be reasonable for fresh and good-tasting coffee to be in that temperature range. But it’s only going to stay there for any length of time if it’s burned on a hot plate or, more ideally, dripped directly into an insulated container.

            It’s more likely their coffee tastes like shit because it was badly roasted, ground months ago, has since gone stale and bitter, and is full of unnecessary added chemicals and preservatives, just like the rest of their shit food.

        • Elivey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I remember correctly, her labia got fused together… Super fucked up burns.

      • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do a bit of research into the marketing actually used for this drink. Assuming the store uses the standard Panera marketing, there’s a big sign on the dispenser saying how much caffeine is in it. It’s a tragic mistake, but unless that location uniquely screwed up, that’s all it is.

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Another commentor said their husband ordered it thinking it was a regular lemonade. The issue could be more wide spread than a single store.

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I noted that. Yet another commentor linked to a vlog where the signs weren’t present because the dispensers were behind the counter and had to be ordered. I think there are absolutely locations NOT showing the marketing.

            But please check out the other comments here and see the one showing what the dispensers with signs look like. Those are BIG signs with BIG mention of caffeine.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think they’re legally liable after what I’ve read through and personally experienced – but I absolutely don’t think this is a frivolous lawsuit. It’s still worth merit when it comes to signage and frankly medical testing.

        The biggest problem is that she drank it without knowing the heart condition. We need to have better detection and screening to make sure people know this.

        • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          From the article:

          Katz had a heart condition called long QT syndrome type 1 and avoided energy drinks at the recommendation of her doctors, according to the filing.

          her roommate and close friend, Victoria Rose Conroy [said,] “She was very, very vigilant about what she needed to do to keep herself safe,” Conroy said. “I guarantee if Sarah had known how much caffeine this was, she never would have touched it with a 10-foot pole.”

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind it existing as a product. If it does though it should be very clearly labeled with warnings that are impossible to miss. This seems great for Panaras on college campuses, but there should be no possibility you confuse it for something else.

          • XbSuper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What coffee are you drinking that has almost 400mg of caffeine in it? Most have around 100mg.

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Most light- to medium-roasts approach 150mg/250mL. The one I’m baselining is Dunkin Donuts, the most popular coffee in the US. A standard Large Iced has almost 400mg of caffeine. You can order it with a shot of espresso, if you like.

              We have to remember that the drink she was consuming (multiple times) was a 30oz. There are very few coffees with less than 350-400mg of caffeine in a 24oz size (or smaller)

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I also wasn’t aware. I imagine there were signs, but who looks for the caffeine content of lemonade? In my case I just had a dash t flavor soda, so I didn’t notice until my kid pointed it out

      Similarly, when my kids were little, I kept them away from stimulants, but who expects to have to prohibit lemonade for the caffeine hit?

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        What very clear, explicit label?

        The Charged Lemonade was “offered side-by-side with all of Panera’s non-caffeinated and/or less caffeinated drinks” and was advertised as a “plant-based and clean” beverage that contained as much caffeine as the restaurant’s dark roast coffee, according to photos of both the menu and beverage dispensers in the store, which were included in the wrongful death lawsuit.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Forget the article; go to an actual Panera. The amount of caffeine is clearly labeled right under the name of the drink. To be fair, their drinks contain way too much, but you can’t say that they don’t already make the label clear and easy to interpret. People are idiots who don’t read the label beyond the “lemonade” part.

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think it’s “way too much”. A large of those every morning is still under the “healthy” FDA recommendations, wherein there are zero known negative side-effects for most people.

        • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Plant based and clean with as much caffeine as our dark roast coffee.” is the full quote. Then, it lists the specific amount of caffeine for the two sizes.

          You can argue it should have a more eye-catching and cautionary presentation, but it’s disingenuous to say it wasn’t clear and explicit.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          contained as much caffeine as the restaurant’s dark roast coffee

          That part. Though I don’t think people realize how much caffeine is in their dark roast coffee. Because it is more caffeine than multiple energy drinks for the same volume. There’s a reason a standard cup of coffee is like 6 oz instead of 20 oz.

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It also includes the caffeine “dosage” in grams for those who want/need to know. That inclusion is more prominent than the description he’s quoting.

            Flip-side, you can’t get a 6oz coffee in most of the US. The most popular coffee around me is generally sold between 20oz and 30oz sizes.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry but no. If we just arbitrarily remove products because someone managed to die because of it… We literally won’t have anything.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Feel free to elaborate.

          Girl dies from drinking caffeine presumably millions of people drink every year.

          /u/Orionza I hope this lawsuit forces them to remove this.

          Per Google definition

          adjective based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.

          Seems arbitrary to me. If we just start removing items because someone unalive themselves with it… where does that line get drawn? The regular 20-ounce serving has 260 milligrams. The can of energy drink in front of me is 200mg @ 12 oz. So per fluid ounce, it’s not that high.
          If I get in a car accident and die… are we going to call for the removal of cars? Just the model that killed me? How is this the companies/products fault?

          https://www.panerabread.com/en-us/lemonade-chargers.html

          Panera Charged Lemonades are the ultimate energy drink guaranteed to charge up your day.

          Plant-based and Clean with as much caffeine as our Dark Roast coffee.