It’s a sound choice. I don’t like to use it, personally, because I want to use something that uses same motions and syntax as editors on servers that I don’t own (ex. customers). And, I’m not a fan of Lisp. It’s a great and (self-)extensible text editor/lisp interpreter, though.
Emacs
(ducks)
It’s a sound choice. I don’t like to use it, personally, because I want to use something that uses same motions and syntax as editors on servers that I don’t own (ex. customers). And, I’m not a fan of Lisp. It’s a great and (self-)extensible text editor/lisp interpreter, though.
I use vi from an Emacs Shell, which was spawned from an Emacs GUI.
bro tryin’ to summon a demon… /s
Emacs is what the unified linux desktop should be
Evil
Emacs
EMACS. It’s the superior text editor.
I’d say it’s a superior text editor.
link the vi command to emacs, and you’ll be able to say you use vi
I haven’t wanted to say that in the 32 years I’ve had the choice.
oh ok then link the emacs command to vi and you’ll be able to keep saying you use emacs while using a better text editor 👍
(please dont kill me this is a joke i dont even use vi please have mercy please spare me please please please)
This is the way.
No