TL;DR I didn’t make it in time. Fuck you Trump!

Edit: For those asking, this was https://www.irvwpc.com/ Please support them if you can.

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Props to whoever this company is. This is one of the best bits of customer service I’ve seen in years.

    • kilonova@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This should be the standard lol. Who you dealing with, the mafia?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean technically it’s not the company’s responsibility. If you’ve ordered something and they’ve sent it in a reasonable time frame and it just gets charged extra on entry. It’s not the company putting the price up, it’s your own government, so you don’t really have a recourse.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Solid boundaries, clearly communicated. Giving the customer a choice without hurting their own bottom line. I agree. Excellent handling of the situation.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I may don’t know how the law works but I believe (at least in my country) if you agree on the conditions you can’t pull a Darth Vader and alter the conditions after signing/ordering and paying.

      Now if there is a clause that states otherwise this may change.

      But I agree, at least they are open and upfront with it.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Doesn’t matter on their end. If they wanted to they could ship it and let it get held up by customs with a demand to pay the tariff to release it.

      • bassow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        They are not changing anything. They are warning the customer import charges wil incur if the purchase proceeds. They gain nothing and stand to lose a sale.

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Import duties are not always part of the agreement.

        They didn’t change the rules, there is now a charge by the government on it getting delivered, not by the company.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I would change “not always” to “practically never”. Every e-commerce site I have ever used warns you that you are responsible for import duties if shipped internationally.

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The doctrine is called force majeure. Most contracts have a force majeure clause.

        If an external factor makes a contract impossible as agreed, the contract can be made void under force majeure. This is very common, and suddenly applied tariffs would likely be covered by a force majeure clause because neither party were responsible for them.