• Tony Bark@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If we take it logical extreme, he might as well be asking for a lawless country.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Maybe you missed it, but he has declared complete lawlessness for himself and his cronies.

        He’s not asking, he has already declared it.

        • Tony Bark@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I know what he meant. That’s why I said, “if we take to it’s logical extreme.”

            • Tony Bark@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              Okay, fine. Here’s a question. If he says a verbal court order isn’t enforceable, why should we follow SCOTUS’ or any lower courts? He is already dismantling systems that not only oversaw what he did, but everyone else.

              • floofloof@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Because the laws will be enforced if you break them, assuming you’re not rich, but not if he breaks them.