https://archive.ph/ktDRE

U.S. officials have told European allies they want them to keep buying American-made arms, amid recent moves by the European Union to limit U.S. manufacturers’ participation in weapons tenders, five sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    What till Americans figure out where high quality small arms come from. Glock anyone? Beretta, Heckler & Koch, Benelli, Browning Arms Company (yes, Browning), SIG Sauer, Springfield Armory, Taurus (some), Chiappa, and more. And don’t forget our Filipino friends at Rock Island Armory!

    Sadly, this part of the tariff shitshow may actually work since we already have plenty of quality domestic producers. But fuck me, the SIG Sauer is the standard US military sidearm and Glock is standard everywhere else. Have fun cop budgets!

    • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I … can’t imagine the US government cares about that (excuse the pun) caliber of gun too much. Police guns will largely be paid for from municipal and state budgets rather than the federal budget, and there’s something larger at stake:

      • Large US producers want to make profits, and I can’t imagine that small, extremely commoditized weapons are the best option for that.
      • The US government would probably like gain more control over the EU. If the US were to attack Greenland, they’d probably be happier if EU nations were immobilized because [shenanigans].

      I may be wrong.

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well … We want you to put the orange turd in jail and quit being dicks to everybody. You can’t always get what you want, can you?

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 days ago

    As I always said, the US never cared about the defense expenditure of European countries except as a way to bolster US exports.

    It was always about extortion and never about defense.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, they were fine with ‘footing the bill for European defense’ as long as enough members bought F35s and whatever other pointless toys the US produced. Only France basically stuck with producing everything domestically.

      Trump never really understood what that unspoken part of the bargain really was about. If Europe is going to actually spend 2% of GDP, they’re going to keep that money domestically as much as possible instead of sending all that spending overseas in dollars.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Trump never really understood that most US “aid” is literally the US gov recycling old ordinance and equipment to continue siphoning tax dollars into the military industrial complex and it’s oligarchs — expenses DOGE have not touched and do not consider “waste”… for some, certainly not fascist imperialism, reason…

      • Baggins@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’d think a businessman as bigly smart (people tell him all the time, many people) as he is would understand this.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          I still don’t know if he’s just stupid or if he’s just doing what Putin wants by undermining NATO. I guess both could be true at the same time.

        • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          He’s a dealer, not a businessman. Deal ≠ business economics ≠ national economics ≠ global economics.

          If you apply the “art of the deal” to the global economy, you’ll wreck it. Well, if you apply his “art of the deal”, you’ll wreck basically anything except you’re own wallet.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            A del would imply he’s good at negotiation. He isn’t. He’s good at leveraging people, but mostly that’s been illegal. If he was good at deals, he wouldn’t have messed up international relations, which is deal making, but more complex. He’s a rich kid that fell upwards and inspired a cult following through sheer luck.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    MAGA: AMERICA FIRST!

    Rest of world: OK, I guess we need to put ourselves first, too.

    MAGA: NOT LIKE THAT!

  • yopyop@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    According to two of the sources, Rubio said any exclusion of U.S. companies from European tenders would be seen negatively by Washington,

    Ah ah ah ! “Would be seen negatively”… Ah ah ah !

  • axh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    We want Greenland. We think you are all worthless freeloaders. We wish to kill your businesses with tariffs because you dared to sell us things (and we don’t care how bad that will be for our people. My voters are too stupid and brainwashed to care and the opposition doesn’t matter)… Also buy our weapons!

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Here’s a tariff! Fuck you!”

    We don’t trust you anymore. We won’t buy from you

    “Noooo, but you must!”

    Fuck 'em.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    I dunno I heard some American with a spray tan say that they didn’t need Europe or Canada…

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    They say this after taunting Germany last month on a visit in Munich where they basically said you‘d have to have military power to be sovereign.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe they should object to the reasons that made us buying European in the first place.