• holomorphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because, while Switzerland is not part of the EU, it follows many of its regulations. Maybe even most of them.

      In this particular case, I happen to know that the inofficial rule is indeed to have burner phones for travel into the us in some cases. But you’re never supposed to have unencrypted data on your phone or laptop in any case.

      • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Switzerland is not en EEA member (Norway and Iceland) and adopt EU regulations on a case by case basis. EEA members are obliged to adopt as default in national legislation, but have the option to decline, but it often comes with consequences.

        There are some EFTA (Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Iceland) deal with the EU but no idea how that works.

        Edit: But you are correct, Switzerland do follow most EU regulations.

  • dan00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ad usual the Swiss government confirms itself as the most pathetic weak coward state in Europe, following a track record of “neutrality” in WWI, with the Nazis and now again with the us regime.

    Remember: when shit hits the fan, good luck find sympathy with your neighbors.

    An embarassing moment for all european countries and people who fought and died for democracy. 👏

  • klu9@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    3 days ago

    Switzerland, however, seems to be taking a less confrontational approach. The message seems clear: Switzerland has no interest in provoking Washington.

    WTF? Simply not taking your regular phone is “confrontational” and a provocation?!?

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Switzerland has no interest in provoking Washington.

      They’re probably laundering Trump’s ill-gotten gains.

    • cabillaud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump’s fellow billionaires will soon need somewhere to hide their super profits. That’s what Switzerland is all about.

    • Mike@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Switzerland going the “appeasement” route with fascists, as per usual.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Given the current state on the US arriving with a burner phone, or even a clean one, would at least get you interrogated, and at worst deported to Guantanamo. Better leave something innocuous on the phone that makes it look used.

    • oppy1984@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      My employer gives everyone in management a cell phone. At least once a quarter someone from management has to travel across the border to do site visits and the like. Most people will only carry the work phone when traveling because of CBP and TSA inspections.

  • hansolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not exactly a huge surprise as Switzerland is not part of the EU. I bet they don’t follow India or Australia’s government policies either! Such savages.

    Switzerland has no shortage of cyber professionals, so either hardened and encrypted devices, or no one traveling with direct access to confidential data via their devices, likely both, is the obvious situation here.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hardened and encrypted devices don’t matter for shit when you’re forced to unlock them. Not having direct access to confidential data like you proposed is much better. But better not even have a way of accessing it that could be detected.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, and the Vienna Convention is what outlines that Swiss or any other country’s diplomatic officials don’t have to do that with work devices.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          … What makes you think the US in its current state gives a single fuck about any convention, much less one named after the capital of another country? They’re exploring ways to circumvent their own constitution so they could send dissidents to CECOT for “terrorism” even if they’re citizens.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Mutually assured destruction.

            The Vienna Convention is what the US uses constantly to keep their people insulated. Which is why there’s a nice diplomatic line at Dulles, and no CBP officer would mess with a diplomatic passport holder from any county.

            But hey, anything’s possible anymore.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The Vienna Convention is what the US uses constantly to keep their people insulated.

              Normally, yes. But at this point I wouldn’t be surprised to see the orange oaf ignore it and then try to muscle other countries into still respecting it when American diplomats are on the line.

              Hell, I’m hoping that won’t happen. But personally, I’d be a bit skittish about traveling to the US right now as a diplomat. I’d also be very skittish about traveling to the US as a non-diplomat.

              • hansolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                OK, well, when that happens you let me know. This is honestly such an unlikely thing.

                • boonhet@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  So is slapping all your major trade partners with tariffs, but look what happened.

                  I’m not saying it’s a certainty, but it’s now a possibility that must be considered whereas previously it would’ve been unthinkable.

    • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is it? Obvious, I mean? To IT guys, sure. But I know from experience that IT guidelines are usually just another set of rules to be broken by users, most of the time on purpose or out of (willful) ignorance 😅

      • feannag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        It doesn’t help that plenty of places still follow old IT guidelines that are bad, so they all get lumped together. E.g. change password every 45 days, can’t BT the last 10, must have 4 characters different, and we don’t have a password manager.

  • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good way to plant false information imo. Say this is definately really your phone so that when they spy on you then you can feed them all kinds of nonsense.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It doesn’t mention what the current directive is. Swiss government – being common people doing a special job, compared to EU officials – are usually more practical in such things.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder what they’d do if the phone refused to turn on and there aren’t any ports to plug into.

  • Gina@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    What precisely can be stolen from those officials in the first place? Oh no, you’ve discovered our large banking system with rich people money!

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      The concern is that even encrypted communicatons, intercepted via the heavily Chinese-tapped US telecommunications company networks, can be used to gain access to other systems. Unencrypted data, sure, that’s a legit concern. China can likely read every SMS sent to any US phone number and no one seems to care at all. Things like downgrade attacks, other man-in-the-middle attacks, and skimming SMS 2FA codes are likely possible with poorly defended systems.

      If the data it’s encrypted, then it’s more about the paranoia that China is collecting everything and planning to decrypt later with quantum processors. Not exactly a huge and urgent worry, but one day they will crack how to decrypt what they collect and will have a record of everything said online.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Normal countries should start doing this too just for US visitors so we can find out who really killed JFK.

          • Gina@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            An onion article saying JFK was taken out by the military industrial complex. And somebody accused a gay guy of having an alias which matched a name in the Warren commission report. Coincidentally the gay dude travelled for business and at the time the CIA interviewed traveling business people for info on their travels as part of data collection. So obviously a CIA agent.

            Last of all, they did not need to fucking shoot him in public, they already had a fuck ton of classified techniques trying to take out the Cuban president.