• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Democrats hugely benefit from FPTP so they will never advocate for replacing it.

    It is a catch22 where the only answer is to call the Democrats bluff and vote for other parties until the Democrats cave to voter demands.

    Democrats also refuse to acknowledge that not voting for them is the only way left to pressure them.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Democrats hugely benefit from FPTP so they will never advocate for replacing it.

      Key point, Newsom of California vetoed a bill to enable more ways to vote then just FPTP.

      FPTP is in the benefit of both parties. It rallies and polarizes so any other idea besides “Let’s not find war, let’s fund education and help people” is considered too unpopular to win.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I will advocate to replace it when I’m in office and a Democrat, against the protests of some of my co-workers. As the other commenter pointed out, Newsom killed an anti-FPTP bill, but that means there’s enough support in the California legislature to get a bill to his desk.