Rivian says “fat finger” caused software update to brick infotainment systems, physical servicing may be required::Today’s cars are more like computers on wheels, and even a seemingly routine software update can lead to unexpected consequences. Rivian unfortunately experienced a “fat finger” mishap with their latest software update, bricking infotainment systems […]

  • Destraight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t have to update my car in order to drive it. Sucks to be them

    • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I thought the Rivian vehicles were still drivable? It was just the infotainment that’s impacted, no?

        • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s always going to be a problem for early adopters of new tech. Plus, since it’s automotive you’d run that risk with the first model year or two after a major redesign too.

          If what Rivian has reported is true it’s not really a failing of the equipment but human error. That’s always going to be tough to account for, though there’s likely improvements to be made to their testing methodology before pushing to prod.

      • Destraight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ok man what if it’s an emergency. Here’s an example: My wife is in labour, but my car has to update so I can’t drive her to the hospital. Now I’ll have to pay a more than 2 grand ambulance ride since it was out of network.

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Fortunately, you can still do that with a Rivian. From the article that no one read:

          Speedometer, charging, backup cameras, locks, lights, wipers, and turn signals are all still functional with the 2023.42 error.

        • gimmemahlulz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          At least with a tesla you have to manually confirm the update, and can cancel out of it for 2 minutes after doing so. If something happens between then and 15 minutes later then i guess you’re fucked, but with the amount of control you have this really should never be a problem.

        • mack7400@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Considering I have a decent chance of getting a “Please wait – updating” message when trying to play a damn videogame nowadays, that’s not out of the realm of possibility.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          You are inconsistent. If you are going to adopt a luddite way of life, have her deliver at home not at the fancy high tech hospital where the computerized anesthesia machine might need to update before the c section incision is made.

        • LUHG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you were going to drive you’d get a taxi instead. I agree but just saying.

  • neanderthal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would think they would keep at least 1 of each model/trim of vehicle for testing these things. This leads me to believe one of the following:

    • Too tight of deadlines
    • Cheap management won’t pay for testing time or units
    • Culture of pencil whipping
    • A bad apple didn’t do their job, which should be caught by procedures
      • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s typical of the automotive industry, they don’t pay anyone reasonably, they treat the workers like shit, and then they get mad when the workers protest, unionize, or quit. This is how the automotive industry works from the top down, from the highest executive to the lowliest salesman.

        Also from an IT/Development perspective, the money is usually meh, but also the technology is usually expected to be cutting edge, while on the backend they’re cutting corners and costs, thus undermining that “cutting edge” factor.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    OTA updates are very much a double-edged sword.

    Usually it’s good, but sometimes you get crap like this or when Tesla downgraded a bunch of Model S batteries when they saw they weren’t holding up as well as expected and wouldn’t line up with their battery warranty.

    E: and it’s insane to me that cars don’t have snapshots of previously installed firmware/other software. Or like an A/B partition style thing where you can revert if an update goes bad.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Weird. My primitive old Samurai started right up this morning, and it’s “infotainment” system (bluetooth boombox bungee-corded to the floor behind the seats) still works.

    Maybe if I’d paid $90,000 for it I could be privileged enough to have a broken functionality.

  • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think while the topic is up it’ll be fun mentioning that the Colorado/Canyon does not have a physical headlight control anymore - in favor of defaulting to Auto and touchscreen controls and the project lead(?) claimed that the system was 100% bug-free.

    Also later there was a bug with some OTA update for that model that’ll kill the battery.

    Anyways, I bought a 4Runner and immediately called to disable its cellular radio. (dubbed DCM in Toyota-land)

      • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        There have been some experimentation but the best (IMO) option is hitting the SOS button to call and navigating the phone menu to get to a representative, not emergency services and having them disconnect your car. You may need your VIN, you’ll need to confirm that you do not want connected services and it may take a day or so to take effect. Now, my SOS button doesn’t have the green light and while the radio - according to the infotainment - is still powered, it is no longer connected to the network.

        Another way if you don’t plan on using the microphone (like for calls) you can pull the DCM fuse but I prefer the above option.

    • TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They did

      Rm -rf /

      To force remove everything recursively instead of

      Rm -fr /

      To remove the French language pack. Rookie mistake really.

    • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      “According to Rivian the glitch occurred when the wrong build with incorrect security certificates was inadvertently sent out. This error resulted in bricking the infotainment systems of an unknown number of vehicles.”

      I always thought that ‘fat finger’ revered to having fingers that are too big for buttons, but I guess it means sending out wrong software versions.

      • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        Fat finger in this context typically means that the person knew what they wanted to do, but typed the wrong thing. Their “fat finger” hit the wrong button. Possible that they wanted certificate 123 in the build, but they accidentally typed 133, or something like that.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dumb-ass managers who thought they could run their embedded software group all Agile and shit, and push stuff out to Production without full testing to meet deadlines, not realizing that they can’t just “roll back” this one.

    • coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They had 2 files in one directory. One said “good update” the other said “bad update-don’t use”. When they wanted to push out the update they used a tablet and tapped on “good update” but they accidentally touched the wrong one a bit more with the thumb.

      Something like this. But maybe they don’t want to say wat really happened.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Between the massive privacy issues and cars getting bricked by automatic OTA updates, I currently see zero reason whatsoever to buy a car made after ~2015.

    I just recently upgraded to a 2013 Rav4 and it has all the tech I could ever want. I’m gonna keep it as long as I can.