• sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the spirit of not getting the joke, Pine64 could be worth checking out for whoever shares this sentiment. It’s the closest thing to user friendly free open source hardware at the moment, and their laptop (the #PinebookPro) actually looks pretty neat. @PINE64 @pine64eu

        • eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are reasons for data collection. But having it be opt out instead of opt in is the more evil of the two choices.

          Fedora, from what I last heard, is doing the same thing for new installs. You gonna go send your pitchfork over that way too?

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago
            1. There isn’t actually a reason for data collection. We know this because prior to this the telemetry wasn’t present. So the things we need the drivers to do don’t actually require them.

            2. Well, yeah. A lot of people were talking about switching from Fedora past few weeks.

            • eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There definitely is a reason to collect telemetry with user consent. Not everyone will go out of their way to report on issues, or there may be features that are underdeveloped that users may use more often than they expect and they want to move resources from focusing on one aspect of the OS to another. As long as it’s done with consent and is an opt-in system it’s fine. I get that this not the case for this Intel one, but I’m speaking generally for development as a whole.

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, as long as we can agree that the case in the OP is not a good example of telemetry being used…

  • Roundcat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    2023 Might actually be the year I become a ludite at this rate. Did every tech company just decide this would be the year to make everything shitty?

  • Gabadabs@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not totally against all telemetry… but can they at least be transparent about when they use it, and exactly what they’re collecting? It really could be as simple as just defaulting to asking the user.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Debian approaches this sort of information gathering in the most respectful way I’ve seen so far. During the installation process there’s a screen where you are presented the option to participate in sharing package popularity statistics. It’s opt-in, just like it should be. Doing this sort of thing with the possibility to opt-out is super shady, but unfortunately very common these days.

    • Im28xwa@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here as I believe (and correct me if I’m wrong) some types of data that can be collected can be helpful to the driver devs, especially for arc but other than that everything else should be opt-in and they should ask for permission of the user

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intel driver updates, once the very pinnacle of sobriety and professionalism, have degenerated into the wild west of driver dissemination reminiscent of the very early days of Windows adoption, where, sometime the shit works, and sometimes it doesn’t.

    There’s been a good 20 years of knowing if you downloaded an intel driver, that shit is going to fix your fucking problem. Not any longer.

    Over the last year, especially with the Intel Driver scan tool, the Video drivers have repeatedly caused my screen to blackout and I’ve had to restore the previous non intel provided driver for my Arc capable video chip. Bluetooth drivers have also been shit.

    • birdcat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this a known thing? I aways install everything that scanner suggests me.

  • sadreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can I psy on you? No

    Can I collected “telemetry” data? Sure, here is key and 200% access to my data, take what you need when you need it.

  • zoe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    only europe can fend off this bs

    us companies are just a medium for american espionage.

      • zoe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        agreed. all worldwide citizens suffer its existence.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      it in the installer, qhere you can select telemetry, and i don’t think they want to piss of companies that use linux, so this is just windows problem(and mesa programmers could just rip the shit out of the drivers anyway), but with the amont of windows telemetry i don’t know why this people are complaining

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s valuable information that will help them improve the state of their software and drivers. The why should be obvious enough, though it’s not nice to have it forced upon you.

  • Vik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fully understand the problematic precedent set by default / always on telemetry, but do we have anything to suggest that this collects any form of PII? I would imagine the data they collect can be previewed on their ToS or something along those lines but I haven’t been able to find it.

    Furthermore, is it safe to presume this change is specific to beta Arc drivers on Windows, or is this likely to become the norm?