Attorneys for Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58, filed an amended lawsuit challenging the proposed new execution method as a potential violation of the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. They asked a federal judge to issue a preliminary injunction to block the execution from going forward next year.

“There is sparse research on how long a human must be exposed to 100% pure nitrogen to cause death, what happens if a human is exposed to less than 100% pure nitrogen for a prolonged period of time, or on the pain or sensations that a human exposed to nitrogen might experience,” his attorneys wrote in the amended lawsuit filed Monday.

They noted in the filing that the American Veterinary Medical Association wrote in 2020 euthanasia guidelines that nitrogen hypoxia is an acceptable method of euthanasia for pigs but not other mammals because it could create an “anoxic environment that is distressing for some species.”

  • Fetus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nitrogen asphyxiation has been a favoured method with the euthanasia crowd for a while now. I’m against the death penalty, but it would be one of my top three preferred ways out if I was given the choice.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nitrogen asphyxiation has been a favoured method with the euthanasia crowd for a while now. I’m against the death penalty, but it would be one of my top three preferred ways out if I was given the choice.

      What are your other two?

        • Etterra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nitrogen is a good pick, though personally if I could pick anything it would be a double barrel point blank to the face. Partially because it’s instantaneous, but mostly just to traumatize the executioner as I look him in the eye. I may not be evil, but I never said I was a good person.

      • Affidavit@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would like to be told that, “You’re free to go, we’ve decided not to execute you”, then spend the next day joyfully celebrating on rides at Disneyland, followed by being shot in the head by a professional hitman without my knowledge. If I have to be executed, at least I can die happy… Shame about spraying my blood over all those kids at Disneyland though.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe it’s ever been a serious proposal, but I’d be ok with the rollercoaster of death

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        NTA but my top three would be

        hypoxia via inert gas

        firing squad

        hanging

        The humiliation of spending my last few minutes on Earth strapped to a chair while my body is chemically forced to fall asleep and my muscles and heart stop is too dehumanizing and is a punishment in itself to me.

        • Fades@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          firing squad

          hanging

          We get it, you wanna suffer. Are you including acid in the eyes for your inert gas exposure?

          • mommykink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            TIL quick, painless, and assured death are suffering.

            Pray tell, what methods do you think are more painless?

            • Thorry84@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How is a firing squad quick or painless?

              You are literally being shot and with the distance most likely not somewhere to be instant death. You lay on the ground and bleed to death whilst feeling the trauma and being aware of everything due to shock. Or worse you are bound to something and hang there like stuck pig until you bleed out in a couple of minutes. Maybe you’ll get lucky and they hit a major artery, that way it only takes 30 secs to a minute.

              It’s not even assured, unless you count them coming over and shooting you again when the realize they fucked up 10 minutes later.

              Hanging can be quick and painless, but only if done right. Hanging and asphyxiating is a slow and awful way to go. Back in the day it was used as a way to torture people to death, they would hang you by the neck from a tree whilst you are sat on a horse. Then the horse would be slapped so it ran away, leaving you swinging. An adult (especially a healthy muscular man/slave, which was the preferred target for this treatment) can hang from the neck a long time before dying, it is truly awful.

              • TheMongoose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I believe the officer in charge of the firing squad has a pistol that they’ll use to finish you off, but that’s still not my definition of quick or painless.

                For the record, I’m like 99% against the death penalty (I could be convinced if the crime was bad enough, the perpetrator was completely unrepentant and there was absolutely zero doubt of guilt, but that last one is a very high bar to clear), but can someone explain why instead of nitrogen, they don’t use carbon dioxide? Doesn’t that have a very similar “you fall asleep and never wake up” effect?

                • khannie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think you’re thinking of carbon monoxide. Carbon dioxide buildup in your lungs would be most unpleasant.

                  I guess that could work too though but it’s a dangerous gas where nitrogen isn’t.

                • Thorry84@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sure, our body has excess CO2 detectors. The feeling of not getting enough air usually has very little to do with not enough oxygen, because there is a lot of oxygen in the air, much more than we need. It’s usually the excess CO2 detectors going off. This is also the reason we pant after holding our breath, the quick deep breaths help quickly lower the CO2 level.

                  For other gasses you are right. CO (Carbon monoxide) doesn’t trigger our CO2 detectors, which is why you can die so easily due to a faulty heater or something like that. Killing yourself by running a car in the garage also kills using CO, the body does not notice, you fall asleep and die.

                  A lot of other gasses also displace oxygen, without our bodies knowing. For example argon or even natural gas (methane). This is where the putting your head in the oven thing comes from. Back in the day there was pure gas in the pipes, so gassing yourself this way was easy. These days they mix in a lot of other stuff so it doesn’t work anymore.

                  The reason nitrogen is used is because it is cheap, easily available and non toxic. Regular air is almost all nitrogen, so the nitrogen itself isn’t the dangerous part, the dangerous part is the lack of oxygen. Since CO2 is still exhaled, the detectors don’t trigger and you die peacefully.